We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Let then eat cake says Dame Helen Ghosh
Comments
-
The ownership of all oil and gas within the land area of Great Britain is vested in the Crown by virtue of the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934. If there so happens to be a shale gas reservoir that extends beneath land owned by the NT, or indeed Clapton's back garden for that matter, I'm not convinced that either of them can do frack all to stop someone extracting it.:)
well, if they try to frack under my back garden I fully intend to stamp my feet and write to the local newspaper
realistically I probably won't be interviewed by the BBC
and I shall continue not to be a member of the NT0 -
well, if they try to frack under my back garden I fully intend to stamp my feet and write to the local newspaper
realistically I probably won't be interviewed by the BBC
and I shall continue not to be a member of the NT0 -
mayonnaise wrote: »Sure, the footprint of fracking will probably be quite small, but why even consider fracking on NT land before we even made a start with fracking on the other 98.5% of the UK.
Because we need to do it where the gas is, and where it can most easily be removed, not where people would prefer to see it done.
It's pointless fracking in Northumberland, where there's no gas, or in parts of Central London, where there's no space, for example.0 -
-
Isn't it funny how we all got distracted by fracking, when the issue of not building any houses on new land, ever, is slightly more important...0
-
It's pointless fracking in Northumberland, where there's no gas
There is.
1. The North UK Carboniferous Shale Region: stretches across northern England and southern Scotland. The shale rock was created in the Carboniferous period. It includes the Bowland Shale in Lancashire - but there are also other basins of rock in Cleveland, Cheshire and Northumberland amongst others.
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/06/carbon-briefing-uk-shale-gas-resource/Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0 -
mayonnaise wrote: »There is.
1. The North UK Carboniferous Shale Region: stretches across northern England and southern Scotland. The shale rock was created in the Carboniferous period. It includes the Bowland Shale in Lancashire - but there are also other basins of rock in Cleveland, Cheshire and Northumberland amongst others.
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/06/carbon-briefing-uk-shale-gas-resource/
Then I'm happpy to stand corrected, I'd understood that there wasn't much there.
I'd want some pretty good reasons, mind, why Druridge Bay (for example) was a better choice than the gardens of Windsor Castle.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards