We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye In The Guardian
Options

trisontana
Posts: 9,472 Forumite


Pensioner fights 'bullying' ParkingEye as it takes 1,000 drivers a week to court
I see that Parking Eye are being "economical with the truth" yet again.
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/apr/12/parkingeye-fine-penalty-dispute-fight?CMP=twt_gu
I see that Parking Eye are being "economical with the truth" yet again.
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/apr/12/parkingeye-fine-penalty-dispute-fight?CMP=twt_gu
What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?
0
Comments
-
Prankster gets another mention on there
hope this lady is getting help from someone with the claim
When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
We don't need the following to help you.
Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
:beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:0 -
Interesting article with Mrs Rodgers looking like she's pretty much on the ball with this.
As an aside, I find it quite disrespectful, and something from a bygone era to refer to someone purely by their surname in the report. And not just the once, but many times. Would take nothing to put a 'Mrs' in front of the Rodgers, or if characters are at a premium, simply call her Anne. It almost makes her sound to be the 'criminal' in all of this.
Pet hate of mine - rant over!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
ParkingEye yet again implying that failing to respond to their unsolicited junk makes one culpable.Je suis Charlie.0
-
They should lock her up and throw away the key.
Bloomin riff raff getting misguided advice off the forums.
Doesn't she know that Parking Eye win the majority of their cases. Okay, they don't state that the shift is swinging dramatically, but don't they realise how difficult it is generating all the legal stuff they have to send out for each case.
And ever tried working out a "genuine pre-estimate of loss?" It's not easy you know.
Bloody pensioners, clogging up the car parks. And don't get me started on Aldi.Illegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
Ivor_Pecheque wrote: »Doesn't she know that Parking Eye win the majority of their cases.
The undefended or very badly defended ones.Ivor_Pecheque wrote: »And ever tried working out a "genuine pre-estimate of loss?" It's not easy you know.
Especially when there isn't one!Ivor_Pecheque wrote: »Bloody pensioners, clogging up the car parks. And don't get me started on Aldi.
Customers, pah! Who needs 'em?Je suis Charlie.0 -
Parking Prankster has passed on this lady's details to Kirkbyinfurnesslad who has agreed to lay rep at her hearing.0
-
Fantastic. I was trying to get my head round the claim about them winning the "majority" of cases. I seem to remember that the claim was once "over 90% of cases."
I'm hazarding a guess that the total number of winning cases is around, or just above, 51%
Which suggests that they are now losing the majority of cases. (Because there has been a drop in the total number of wins from 90% to 51%).
I suspect that it will soon be the case that the total of won cases will be in the minority, especially as folk such as Mrs Rodgers, are becoming more and more aware of what a sham this is.Illegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
Someone from here with the proper knowledge should contact the guardian to see if they will run a follow up story correcting parking eyes 'figures' and show them and capita up as the bunch of lying cowboys they are.0
-
4consumerrights wrote: »Parking Prankster has passed on this lady's details to Kirkbyinfurnesslad who has agreed to lay rep at her hearing.
I bet Parking Eye will be over the moon with that ! :rotfl:"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards