We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mistake in this week's IC?
theshortstack
Posts: 76 Forumite
Morning all,
I've just been reading through the latest edition of IC and come across the "Reach your (ISA) target in 27 years" on page 39.
Now I'm no maths expert (as I'm sure I'm about to find out), but as a bit of a noobie to investing I wanted to go through the numbers to figure out how they worked ... and I think the second number in the third column (the one that currently reads £27,341) is wrong.
I wanted to run it past you though just to make sure that I'm not missing something myself.
I would assume that that number should be the sum of the value of the ISA pot from 2013 (£11,520) and the total annual allowance for 2014 (£15,000) with 5% added on top for assumed long term performance.
i.e
If that's the case, then the number in the third column should read £27,846 which is kind of a big deal because if you go on for there, I reckon you can hit your target a year earlier.
So what have I done wrong here?
I've just been reading through the latest edition of IC and come across the "Reach your (ISA) target in 27 years" on page 39.
Now I'm no maths expert (as I'm sure I'm about to find out), but as a bit of a noobie to investing I wanted to go through the numbers to figure out how they worked ... and I think the second number in the third column (the one that currently reads £27,341) is wrong.
I wanted to run it past you though just to make sure that I'm not missing something myself.
I would assume that that number should be the sum of the value of the ISA pot from 2013 (£11,520) and the total annual allowance for 2014 (£15,000) with 5% added on top for assumed long term performance.
i.e
(11,520 + 15,000) * 1.05
If that's the case, then the number in the third column should read £27,846 which is kind of a big deal because if you go on for there, I reckon you can hit your target a year earlier.
So what have I done wrong here?
0
Comments
-
Probably should have waited until I got home and posted a screenshot, but have got one now to highlight my point:
0 -
I assume they've allowed the growth to only apply to that for the previous year.
The main thing though is that whilst these projections are useful guidance they are based on a load of assumptions. You almost certainly aren't going to get 5% growth per year, and certainly not exactly 5% every year, so it would be better to vary that. Let's face it if you're heavy in equities you could easily be down 15% one year and up 20% the next or vice versa, so a few hundred pounds is neither here nor there even with the effects of compounding.0 -
Have you noticed that the first "year" is actually 15 months?
So the answer is close to 11520*1.05^1.25 the original 11520 for 15 moths
+ 11520*1.05^0.25 The first part of the second year allowance for 3 months
+ 3480 the rest of the allowance from July 2015
Which gives: 27385
So not too bad, though not exactly what they give.0 -
Thanks very much your thoughts - I wasn't trying to be the picky trainspotter here, I just wanted to understand the maths in order to get a better grip on investing basics. I won't take it too literally then.
Cheers for your help - much appreciated!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards