We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Give everyone a house to call a home

2»

Comments

  • 92203
    92203 Posts: 239 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 29 March 2014 at 7:16PM
    The problem with this is the mentality.

    Give everyone a home and they will want a Ferrari next.

    To own a home is not a right, it's an aspiration and reward for those that achieve it.
    Take away people's aspirations and I'd hate to consider what the world could turn out to be.

    Pretty much everyone in this country has a home anyway, the only difference with actually giving people a home would be Spivs, Chancers, Gen-Xers and Baby Boomers(delete as appropirate) no longer being able to extract wealth generated through the productivity of others while doing very little themselves. (Other than sitting on an asset and using their privileged / fortunate financial position to do so).

    http://www.progress.org/banneker/chur.html
  • floridaman wrote: »
    If having a home was a basic right society would focus on other issues
    As soon as you were given a house, you'd expect to be given something else, it'd never end would it.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    I quite fancy this one but then it doesn't come with much land really:

    http://www.domain.com.au/property/for-sale/house/nsw/point-piper/?adid=2010965253

    you should know better than to use this forum to advertise your second home is for sale.......:)
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    floridaman wrote: »
    And we will change the world

    Have you considered doing this without giving loads of people who already have a house another one that they can give a name?
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    The problem with this is the mentality.

    Give everyone a home and they will want a Ferrari next.

    To own a home is not a right, it's an aspiration and reward for those that achieve it.
    Take away people's aspirations and I'd hate to consider what the world could turn out to be.

    No need to consider it, you can see it in Tower Hamlets, New Cross, or even Basingstoke.

    People like Floridaman seem not to be able to see the bigger picture, to understand the harm that it will do to everyone if people like he are given the trappings of success without any need to have worked for it. It would not even be good for him, let alone the rest of us, if he were given a house. Whatever small sense of self-worth he currently has would be taken away, replaced with only a victim mentality.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    92203 wrote: »
    Pretty much everyone in this country has a home anyway, the only difference with actually giving people a home would be Spivs, Chancers, Gen-Xers and Baby Boomers(delete as appropirate) no longer being able to extract wealth generated through the productivity of others while doing very little themselves. (Other than sitting on an asset and using their privileged / fortunate financial position to do so).

    This looks like a forum turning point. I'm an early Gen X - before this post I thought I was a victim rather than oppressor.

    You know you're getting older when you see history repeating itself.
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    floridaman wrote: »
    And we will change the world
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQMfkVEPRzQuwcfbjhghcBMTWs7onxL0AtqsFzWbdfwtOZQLEErbA
  • Jason74
    Jason74 Posts: 650 Forumite
    BillJones wrote: »
    No need to consider it, you can see it in Tower Hamlets, New Cross, or even Basingstoke.

    People like Floridaman seem not to be able to see the bigger picture, to understand the harm that it will do to everyone if people like he are given the trappings of success without any need to have worked for it. It would not even be good for him, let alone the rest of us, if he were given a house. Whatever small sense of self-worth he currently has would be taken away, replaced with only a victim mentality.

    All very true of course. 'Giving' people fundemental things like housing (except to cover short term periods of exceptional need) doesn't help anybody in the longer term, for exactly the reasons that you suggest. It's always better for people to earn them for themselves.

    The issue we have at present though , is that the economics are such that for many people, there is no real prospect of them being able to "earn" such things, no matter how hard that they work. This is a huge problem imho, and represents a significant long term risk to the stability of our society. Unfortunately, none of themain political parties seem to be acknowledging the problem, let alone having a serious plan to address it.
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    It's hard to know what the solution would be. I know people who are neither stupid nor incompetent, but whose decisions at school, and since, mean that they will never be in a position to own a nice house.

    It was, and still is, within their grasp, but they just keep choosing to blow money, drift along at work, and blame others for their circumstances.

    It wouldbe morally wrong to tax other people more to give these people something that they choose not to provide for themselves.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.