We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
help! - endownment not activated by mortgage provider 16 years ago
Comments
-
may as well try and claim the shares as well that he missed out on by not having the endowment
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
IMHO you guys are being too mean and cynical to the OP.
It's by no means unusual for BSs to c*ck up mortgage arrangments to their customers' detriment.
Take the case of Abbey. Fifteen years ago, rather than put up people's mortgage repayments when interest rates rose, they simply extended the mortgage term.But they didn't bother to tell the affected customers - and nor did they sort out the situation when rates came down.
Result: thousands of people thought they were paying off their mortgages as originally planned, and suddenly discover ( possibly as they are due to retire) that they have to keep paying for another 10 or 15 years.
Sheer incompetence
:mad:
Why should such customers suffer?Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
EdInvestor wrote: »IMHO you guys are being too mean and cynical to the OP.
It's by no means unusual for BSs to c*ck up mortgage arrangments to their customers' detriment.
Take the case of Abbey. Fifteen years ago, rather than put up people's mortgage repayments when interest rates rose, they simply extended the mortgage term.But they didn't bother to tell the affected customers - and nor did they sort out the situation when rates came down.
Result: thousands of people thought they were paying off their mortgages as originally planned, and suddenly discover ( possibly as they are due to retire) that they have to keep paying for another 10 or 15 years.
Sheer incompetence
:mad:
Why should such customers suffer?
Good point and I agree.
This brings in a nice balance of opinion to the thread.
JoeKI am an Independent Financial Adviser.Anything posted on this forum is for discussion purposes only. It should not be considered financial advice. Different people have different needs and what is right for one person may be different for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser who can advise you after finding out more about your situation.0 -
Read the whole article in the link from dunston. Obviously this circumstance is not unkwown hence the Ombudsman briefing note. We have handled a few of these cases and much depends on the documentation at the time. If the Halifax have admitted the error in writing the complaint should go to them.
Make sure that it is formally lodged with halifax, and Standard life and refer to both parties when referring to fos0 -
Im sure its little consolation but at least this has occured on a house you bought 16 yrs ago ie early 90s. I would hazard a guess that the price you paid is tiny compared to the 'value' of the property now. I appreciate that if you thought you would end up owning the property outright after 25 yrs that is what you should get but at least if it all goes pear shaped with your claim you wont end up homeless as you will have made a huge capital gain.0
-
Interestingly enough this happened to my work colleague as well, also Halifax, he realised last year that 10 years down the line no endowment had ever been in place.............no help at all to the OP I supposeNorn Iron Club Member #64
Wikkity Wikkity Wikkity Lets go racing!0 -
sciencegeek wrote: »Im sure its little consolation but at least this has occured on a house you bought 16 yrs ago ie early 90s. I would hazard a guess that the price you paid is tiny compared to the 'value' of the property now. I appreciate that if you thought you would end up owning the property outright after 25 yrs that is what you should get but at least if it all goes pear shaped with your claim you wont end up homeless as you will have made a huge capital gain.
I appreciate you are not trying to offend sciencegeek, but this is one of the quotes that appears very often on these threads.
I know a lot of people look at their properties more as an investment item, but a few, like my husband and I look at our house purely as the family home.
We are facing a ridiculous shortfall in our endowment and Yes our property is worth 4 times more than when we purchased it in 1991. Yes, if we sold it we could very easily pay off the mortgage and swallow the shortfall.When we bought our house, we bought it because we love the area and the fantastic views accross unspoilt countryside. My children adore the place and have asked that we never move.
Therefore, we have extended our mortgage term which takes virtually into retirement. but what else can we do?
We don't want to move!
Does that sound naive, or do other posters feel the same.
regards
Crazy saverIf only I knew then what I know now
0 -
The other thing you can do is convert the mortgage into an equity release one, which will mean you no longer make any payments on the mortgage.
This is not a very good deal compared with downsizing but it is a way out for people who get caught with mortgages in retirement for one reason or another.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
EdInvestor wrote: »Have you looked at converting the mortgage to repayment? How much higher will the premiums be to pay it back over the 9 remaining years?
What does it look like if the new mortgage term is extended to 15 years?
In the early years, people pay mainly interest back on their mortgage: they don't start to reduce the capital owed for quite a few years, and most of the loan is actually repaid in the final 10 years of the mortgage term, particularly if interest rates are high, as they were 16 years ago.
So the situation may not be as bad as you might imagine, particularly given the poor performance of many endowments in recent years.
Yes we have today. It doesnt look as bad as we first thought (it does almost double the monthly payments however initial payment was pretty low; still dads personal circumstances mean it would be a signifcant impact on him) so very relieved there, lets just say theres many people out there in worse situations.0 -
defender_of_the_weak wrote: »Read the whole article in the link from dunston. Obviously this circumstance is not unkwown hence the Ombudsman briefing note. We have handled a few of these cases and much depends on the documentation at the time. If the Halifax have admitted the error in writing the complaint should go to them.
Make sure that it is formally lodged with halifax, and Standard life and refer to both parties when referring to fosseatzie wrote:Interestingly enough this happened to my work colleague as well, also Halifax, he realised last year that 10 years down the line no endowment had ever been in place.............no help at all to the OP I suppose
What were the outcomes here guys?
thanks0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards