We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What now for Final Salary, Defined Benefit and Public Sector pensions?

13»

Comments

  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    kidmugsy wrote: »
    It would not be difficult to introduce a sort of "virtual" DC scheme for govt employees, whereby taxpayers don't actually have to find most of the cash until someone retires, but meantime he could manage the investment of his virtual ETFs and so on. And perhaps real gilts, if govt is looking for new buyers of those.

    Why bother? It would be simpler to close the existing schemes to existing and new members and accept the liability to that point. They could then replace the scheme going forward with a real DC scheme.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,080 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BobQ wrote: »
    Why bother? It would be simpler to close the existing schemes to existing and new members and accept the liability to that point. They could then replace the scheme going forward with a real DC scheme.

    Because, until the current cohort die off, they would double(ish) the current costs as they would have to pay the pensions and invest the current contributions rather than use contributions to cover pension payments
  • paparossco
    paparossco Posts: 294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Tom2023 wrote: »
    Personally I'd like my entire Final Salary pot. I could then invest it and pass it on to my children.

    As said before, there is no 'pot' as such but your scheme will probably allow for pension commutation which maximises the lump sum element.
    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
    Wayne Dyer
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you want to leave money to children, then open a PP alongside your DB scheme.
  • Alex444
    Alex444 Posts: 148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    I retired from Public Service and have index linked pension, and I then worked for a private company for 8 years, building up a pot of £12K in their pension scheme.

    On being made redundant in August I enquired about the pot as I was 62years of age with a small chance of being re-employed.

    I was advised by my IFA that I could take 25% as lump sum and take the rest as a pension payout of approx. £240 per year.

    As I have regular income on my main pension this secondary one was not required, the only time the full amount would have been issued was to my wife on my demise.

    As the goalposts seem to have shifted I am in contact with my IFA.
  • ayayay
    ayayay Posts: 97 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Easy - transfer your final salary scheme to a personal pension immediately before retiring and do what you like with it. Probably silly if you did though.
  • Seabee42
    Seabee42 Posts: 448 Forumite
    Just be aware that your current automatic right to a transfer can be restricted a year before normal retirement.
  • trippy
    trippy Posts: 539 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    ayayay wrote: »
    Easy - transfer your final salary scheme to a personal pension immediately before retiring and do what you like with it. Probably silly if you did though.



    There's already talk of removing the right to do this. The immediate plan is to restrict transfers from public sector schemes with a view to extending this to all DB schemes.


    Although you could bring in a protected rights type scenario whereby transfer values from DB schemes will still be restricted to a max 25%. This would allow the member flexibility to invest the value of his pot in something else to try and beat revaluation. But then surely he'd just transfer it to a SIPP anyway?


    I work in the occupational DB scheme sector and am prepared for a rush of people opting out of active schemes with future accrual with a view to accessing their £400k transfer value. A sort of pseudo pensions liberation, with a lower tax hit.
  • Alex444
    Alex444 Posts: 148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    From my IFA:-

    Our understanding (only guidelines not definitive) is that a pot of £10k can be taken so under that rule you couldnt but if you have guaranteed income of £12k per annum you could.

    With 16K per year coming in looks like I've cracked it.
  • OldBeanz
    OldBeanz Posts: 1,438 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This is just a transitional amount for flexible drawdown. From April '15 it is intended that you would not require any pension to access the funds.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.