We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Old employer money purchase scheme - what is considered a decent appreciation rate

Evening people

I took part in a money purchase scheme with a previous employer. I'm a cautious kind of guy so I opted for my money to go into the most secure & safest of the 3 options that were available.

I've found a statement of account dated at the very end of 2012 which states that my total account value was just under £45,500 at that time.

No contributions have been made since and, after checking my account online tonight, it now shows a balance of just over £47,500.

By my reckoning this equates to a return of just under 4% per annum.

Does this sound about right for the "safe" option, and would anyone like to share details about the kind of returns they have made by being a little more adventurous and going for the middle option? (I assume most company pension schemes offer the same 3 kind of choices?).

I've still got 20+ years til (expected) retirement so Ive still got a long way to go before I retire!

Comments

  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 March 2014 at 9:06PM
    Stating a cautious approach means that you've probably opted for a heavy allocation in bonds and cash, which as you can see aren't paying much at the moment.

    A higher risk option would mean that you would have more allocated to shares, which have performed much better, you could have seen 10% or more annual increases in a Heavy shares allocation. We are even in times where many shares are yielding more than bonds or cash, which is unusual historically.

    With the timespan you've indicated you should have a higher allocation to shares, though accept that higher risk and volatility will mean that the valuation will be like a roller coaster rather than a gentle gradient. Quoted returns can typically be around 7% a year, no guarantees but it should be better than you've experienced so far.

    Your example of three options in a pension scheme is a little old fashioned and outdated, many schemes now offer you scores or hundreds of funds to choose from, with a mix of asset classes, geographical spread and risk and volatility.

    If you quote your scheme, provider and options then someone might be able to comment further.
  • Carnival789
    Carnival789 Posts: 153 Forumite
    Thanks bigadaj, that gives me something to think about.

    I've recently started a new job and, for my new employers scheme, I'm putting money into the "middle" option which will hopefully offer a better rate of return. Just need to decide what to do with my old fund.

    The old fund which I mentioned in my first post is with Barclays and their UKRF Anchor fund.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.