IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Appealed to PCM no POPLA appeal needed

Options
ABN
ABN Posts: 293 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
edited 20 February 2014 at 2:11PM in Parking tickets, fines & parking
Appeal sent to PCM

“Dear Sir/Madam
REF xxxxxxxxx
I am writing to you as the registered keeper of the vehicle Reg xxxxxx with reference to Notice to Keeper number xxxxxxx regarding an alleged parking incident on 23/11/2013 at Haydon Way.

I am challenging, as the registered keeper, your parking charge notice on the following grounds. Please respond to each individual point that I state.
1) Unclear / Insufficient signage. The driver did not see any parking notices in the vicinity of where the vehicle was parked nor on the approach to where it was parked. I contend that your signage does not comply with the BPA guidelines.
2) Your claim is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss. The wording on your NTK appears to indicate that the parking charge represents damages for a breach of the parking contract - liquidated damages, in other words compensation agreed in advance. Accordingly, the charge must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss. The estimate must be based upon loss following from a breach of the parking terms. I challenge whether you or the landowner suffered any financial loss directly arising from my vehicle being parked in the alleged space.
Please note POPLA have upheld numerous appeals in favour of the motorist, including appeals against your company, on this ground alone. Thus I must conclude that you are fully aware of the validity of this point in this challenge.
4) I do not believe that your company has sufficient interest in the land to grant you the right to form contracts with drivers and pursue charges in your own name in the courts.
5) Your NTK does not confirm with Schedule 4 of Protection Of Freedom Act 2012
If this challenge is rejected I require that you
1) Send me a valid POPLA code to allow me to make a detailed appeal to POPLA based on, but not limited to, the above points.
2) A copy or photograph of the signage used at the site.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours faithfully the registered keeper,”

They replied today.

“We have considered your case carefully and have accepted your appeal to cancel the PCN. No further action is required from you in respect of the PNC”

So result without the further “worry” of having to write a POPLA appeal.
Would like to thank PePiPoo and MSE without whom I would most likely have failed.

Comments

  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Might be better to edit the thread title to remove mention of POPLA. At the moment it suggests that PCM have rejected your appeal and not supplied a POPLA code, whereas in fact they have accepted your appeal and cancelled the PCN.

    PS - well done. :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.