We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Mortgage - FTB - To fee, or not to fee?!
Yorkie84
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi all,
First time poster, seeking some mortgage advice.
My wife and I are about to purchase our first house. We'll be taking out a mortgage with the Halifax, who have two options available.
Both fixed for 2 years. Option 1 is at 2.64% but with a £999 fee, which is added to the loan amount. Option 2 is 2.94% with no fee. Details as follow: -
Option 1 - 2.64%, £1k Fee, 25 Years
£134,000
£611 pm - 2 years = £14,664
Principal Owing - £126,221
Option 2 - 2.94%, No Fee, 25 Years
£133,000
£627 pm - 2 years = £15,048
Principal Owing - £125,573
Extra Paid - £384
Uplift in balance - £648
To me, the loan with no fee at the higher rate is clearly the better option, yet our mortgage broker has recommended option 1.. Is there something I'm missing?!?!
He also recommended a 35 year mortgage, whereas I'd much prefer a 25 year term from the outset. I believe the only difference is the smaller CONTRACTUAL repayment amount? I think the temptation not to make overpayments to take it up to the same paid on a 25 year deal would be too great, especially after Xmas etc, so would always go for the 25 year option.. Again is there something I'm missing?!
Thanks for reading, any advice greatly appreciated!!
First time poster, seeking some mortgage advice.
My wife and I are about to purchase our first house. We'll be taking out a mortgage with the Halifax, who have two options available.
Both fixed for 2 years. Option 1 is at 2.64% but with a £999 fee, which is added to the loan amount. Option 2 is 2.94% with no fee. Details as follow: -
Option 1 - 2.64%, £1k Fee, 25 Years
£134,000
£611 pm - 2 years = £14,664
Principal Owing - £126,221
Option 2 - 2.94%, No Fee, 25 Years
£133,000
£627 pm - 2 years = £15,048
Principal Owing - £125,573
Extra Paid - £384
Uplift in balance - £648
To me, the loan with no fee at the higher rate is clearly the better option, yet our mortgage broker has recommended option 1.. Is there something I'm missing?!?!
He also recommended a 35 year mortgage, whereas I'd much prefer a 25 year term from the outset. I believe the only difference is the smaller CONTRACTUAL repayment amount? I think the temptation not to make overpayments to take it up to the same paid on a 25 year deal would be too great, especially after Xmas etc, so would always go for the 25 year option.. Again is there something I'm missing?!
Thanks for reading, any advice greatly appreciated!!
0
Comments
-
Don't go for a 35 yr mortgage if you don't need to, it's like a noose around your neck.
I would go for option 2 also,0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards