We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

State pension deferral - worth while??

13567

Comments

  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Assuming normal good health and an age close to 65 it's optimal for males to defer for 1-3 years and females 2-5 years. This is picking the optimal range from curves of expected actuarial benefit from an actuarial study of the question. Those with long life expectancy might benefit from a bit longer, those with shorter life expectancy from less or no deferring.

    Deferring can be done in one of two ways:

    1. By not claiming the state pensions.
    2. After starting to receive them, you can defer once per lifetime on request.

    Some people who have money now but who might, say, have a level annuity, may choose to defer for longer to get an increase in the state pension part of their income that increases with inflation. This provides extra protection for living a long life or possible periods of high inflation.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    jamesd wrote: »
    Assuming normal good health and an age close to 65 it's optimal for males to defer for 1-3 years and females 2-5 years. This is picking the optimal range from curves of expected actuarial benefit from an actuarial study of the question. Those with long life expectancy might benefit from a bit longer, those with shorter life expectancy from less or no deferring.

    .......


    From my calculations based on a simple death age at 87 I can duplicate your figures by adding in a DCF calculation. So yes, if you plan to invest all your SP income on a reasonable set of equity investments then your optimum deferral age goes down to low figures depending on your investment return. However if you plan to use the SP income to maximise your expenditure before you die then the figures I propose are perhaps more relevant.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    At the top end of the ranges I gave the chance of being better off was decreasing, fairly steeply for males. The difference is probably that the study wasn't just using money but was also including the chance of dying each year and that starts to reduce the chance of being better off as the years pass, or if you start at a later age.

    The calculation you did is a lot better when deferring is looked at as a way to provide for the chance of living a long life, without worrying about what happens if you happen to die in the younger years.
    Linton wrote: »
    However if you plan to use the SP income to maximise your expenditure before you die then the figures I propose are perhaps more relevant.
    That's when your figures are most problematic. The longer the deferring, the greater the number who end up worse off from deferring, dying while still deferring or before they have recovered the income not received while deferring.

    You might find it interesting to get a mortality table and factor that in to work out the chance of being better off as the number of years of deferring is increased.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    While neither is the study I referred to, here are two articles that you may find interesting:

    How long should you defer?
    Deferring State Pension
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    jamesd wrote: »
    At the top end of the ranges I gave the chance of being better off was decreasing, fairly steeply for males. The difference is probably that the study wasn't just using money but was also including the chance of dying each year and that starts to reduce the chance of being better off as the years pass, or if you start at a later age.

    The calculation you did is a lot better when deferring is looked at as a way to provide for the chance of living a long life, without worrying about what happens if you happen to die in the younger years.

    That's when your figures are most problematic. The longer the deferring, the greater the number who end up worse off from deferring, dying while still deferring or before they have recovered the income not received while deferring.

    You might find it interesting to get a mortality table and factor that in to work out the chance of being better off as the number of years of deferring is increased.


    Yes the more one looks at what is apparently a simple question, the more complex it gets. If you die early before you have recouped the costs of deferring you dont care because you are dead whereas if you defer too early you could spend years regretting your mistake.

    For interest, from my non DCF calculations if you defer until 72 you have roughly 30% chance of actually loosing out. Deferring til 70 makes it around 25% and 66 15%. Note that these figure are for the cohort born in 1951 as the statistics dont go back further.
  • patanne
    patanne Posts: 1,286 Forumite
    edited 5 January 2014 at 12:24PM
    At least if you die before taking the deferred state pension all the lump sum goes into your estate

    ETA - this is not correct see #31
  • System
    System Posts: 178,412 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    patanne wrote: »
    At least if you die before taking the deferred state pension all the lump sum goes into your estate


    Someone said earlier up the thread that one way of defering was simply to not claim your pension immediately.
    What happens if you don't claim but then die?
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • System
    System Posts: 178,412 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Another factor not so far mentioned is what kind of flexibility you have regarding your work and retirement options, and ultimately whether you want to retire, wholy or partly, or not.

    As a director of a small firm I can chose to continue to work any number of days or hours I like, indefinitely if I wish.
    I am considering progressive retirement, perhaps one day a week, per year, over the next 5 years. or perhaps not.

    In flexible circumstances like these the SP would conveniently substitute for employed income, if I dropped my working week. But the optimum balace from a financial point of view would be to work full time until I am 85, and defer the SP until death and then take a lump sum.
    That's taking a long-term view. But then that's not retirement :)
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • sleines
    sleines Posts: 32 Forumite
    Its the Pension Service (DWP) you need to contact not the Pension Advisory Service. The new claims number is 0800 731 7898 - I understand you don't want to claim yet but on this number they can tell you how much you were entitled to 3 years ago, today and in X years so you can make an informed decision yourself
  • sleines
    sleines Posts: 32 Forumite
    Someone said earlier up the thread that one way of defering was simply to not claim your pension immediately.
    What happens if you don't claim but then die?

    This is direct out of State Pension Deferral guide

    'What happens if I die?
    This depends on whether you are married or in a civil
    partnership, and whether you die before or after you claim
    your State Pension.
    If you are married or in a civil partnership and you die,
    your husband, wife or civil partner may qualify for extra
    State Pension or a lump-sum payment because you put
    off claiming your State Pension.
    If you put off claiming your shared additional pension,
    the rules are different. However, your husband, wife or
    civil partner could still inherit all or part of the lump sum from putting off your shared additional pension if you had
    already claimed your State Pension and had chosen a
    lump sum before you died. In this case it will form part of
    your estate.
    If you die after claiming your State Pension but before
    choosing to get extra State Pension or a lump-sum
    payment, someone may be appointed to make this choice
    on behalf of your estate. (You have three months after
    claiming your State Pension to decide whether you want
    to get extra State Pension or a lump-sum payment.)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.