The Good, the Mad & the Lovely

zippydooda

fairclaire wrote: »

This is true! I just had a hangover and some mascara smeared down my face in the morning.

You had a near disaster with Mr TS and your kettle though :eek::eek: men shouldn't drink :rotfl:

if we didn't how would ugly women get .............................
leave to imagination and runs for cover.

Wool27

David. wrote: »

:eek:he is about 70 :rotfl: with a ponytail

Not distracted like that..is there a smiley being sick?

Just the farcicleness. Makes me larf.

fairclaire

zippydooda wrote: »

if we didn't how would ugly women get .............................
leave to imagination and runs for cover.

:eek::eek: naughty boy :rotfl::rotfl:

At least when I wake up with black stuff on me I know what it is

FilthyLuka

Shortfatscotsbloke wrote: »

I know some of us love a good stash piccie.:)

Here's what I managed to get yesterday and today. 162 bottles of various types of diet coke, all better than free. A big thank you to Sada and their wonderful APG system.

And, an even bigger thank you to FloFlo. I had spent all day working yesterday and played catchup at about 3:30pm. I saw her post in the morning about the multis not showing, checked msm myself, came back to find that someone had just posted that they had worked. Waddled out the door as fast as I could!!:p

So, thanks FloFlo..:D:D

Stashtastic!!


it looks like most of that is diet - will you be having a name change in the new year to shortslimscotsbloke?


PS - you know the next glitch is bound to be on Mentos - tempted???

zippydooda

Wool27 wrote: »

Not distracted like that..is there a smiley being sick?

Just the farcicleness. Makes me larf.

zippydooda

fairclaire wrote: »

:eek::eek: naughty boy :rotfl::rotfl:

At least when I wake up with black man on me I know who it is

named mark.


that's one for tweets

fairclaire

zippydooda wrote: »

named mark.


that's one for tweets

:eek::eek:....:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

aau1

Wool27 wrote: »

Not distracted like that..is there a smiley being sick?

Just the farcicleness. Makes me larf.

Looks like i'm going to bed having learned a new word. :rotfl:

At least i learned something today other than i hate studying for this exam

Night all. :wave:

zippydooda

night folks :beer:

Anon

itch_for_a_glitch wrote: »

Whilst the explanations given are correct, I (where possible) avoid buying the same with an APG, for instance I have a coke APG, if the bacon is a goer tomorrow I'll use it, if its just coke I'll pay cash for coke, and use the APG for "normal" shopping.
Its best (IMHO) when there are two or more glitches on the go, then I alternate, i.e. buy bacon with a coke APG and vice versa.

We discuss this periodically and we each have our own way. Yours is possibly the best way not to draw attention to yourself and not have "linked" APG transactions (in case they are tracking them).

Personally, I generally rinse and repeat and am not too worried buying an identical shop with an APG (picking my CS carefully, if that is possible - probably more likely getting a trouting for an APG close to the full value of the shop than getting an identical shop?).

I work on the basis that on the first shop, it cost me £10 cash (for simplicity), generating an APG of £10, therefore I have effectively got my all money back. On the Coke glitch, this is almost correct (though you get back more than you spent!). It doesn't much matter, I suppose, where we are getting a full refund if you then use that APG for a normal shop and use cash for the next APG shop.

However, in my mind, using the APG to generate another APG means introducing less cash into the deal and I am therefore better off ... :think:. So in my example, after shop 2 I have "spent" £10 cash but now have 18 bottles of Diet Coke ... and a second APG for around £10 ...

That said, at some point I am going to have to get normal shopping so whether I pay with cash or an APG, overall it may work out the same :huh:.

Anon