We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rethinking economics is starting now, in Britain

1235»

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    antrobus wrote: »
    Read the article again;

    The vulnerability of banks to a collapse in the debt bubble is illustrated by the recent rapid rise in their funding gap (see chart), which shows that in recent years the amount lent to customers that is not backed by customer deposits has soared. Banks are, therefore, having to rely much more on the wholesale money market, which tends to be far more expensive than customer deposits.


    Doesn't really read as a warming of financial meltdown; more a likely rise in funding costs.
  • John_Pierpoint
    John_Pierpoint Posts: 8,401 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 28 November 2013 at 7:54AM
    So stock brokers are descended from lottery ticket resellers.

    Bankers from fly by night Jewish goldsmiths.

    And the global financial crisis was created when gamblers and physicists, using computer "intelligence and processing speed" took control from the two above?

    9781780721392.jpg

    However, the book didn't convince me that speculating in money markets is actually of any use to anyone, except those it enriches.

    I think that might be a bit of a simplistic judgement.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Doesn't really read as a warming of financial meltdown; more a likely rise in funding costs.

    It refers to the "vulnerability of banks"; you can interpret that as you like. Personally I don't think that the BoE quite anticipated how bad things would get and how 'vulnerable' some banks were. But then hindsight is always a wonderful thing.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.