We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Access to disbled toilets being restricted by employer
Comments
-
no you're missing the entire point. He's not being discriminated against just because he didn't have his own key.0
-
scheming_gypsy wrote: »no you're missing the entire point. He's not being discriminated against just because he didn't have his own key.[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
it does seem a daft system, what if the manager is off work? in a meeting?
of course even if people have keys, there is no guarantee that it will be free at the exact time someone wants to use it but thats probably a rare occasion.0 -
Yes it is discrimination as having to ask for they key to use the disabled toilet is humiliating.
This is covered in the Act.Be happy...;)0 -
He says he did, and got the response to ask his manager for the key every time... he did order his own key, but its taken a while to arrive
I think that this *is* discriminatory, unless there is an equivalent requirement that able-bodied employees have to ask a manager for a key in order to access toilet facilities.
I think it would be reasonable for your OH to raise this with the employer, to point out that while he has, fortunately, been able to address the issue by getting his own RADAR key, there was a short term problem which was not addressed appropriately by the employer, and which is likely to arise again for other disabled employees or visitors.
Quite apart from anything else, what was OPs partner supposed to do if the manager had a day off, or was in a meeting?.
Employees are supposed to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees and customers. It's hard to think of *any* employer where paying £5 for a second key would not be reasonable.
And while the original issue may have been caused by stupidity not malice, the failure to address it when raised is a red flag0 -
I think that this *is* discriminatory, unless there is an equivalent requirement that able-bodied employees have to ask a manager for a key in order to access toilet facilities.
I think it would be reasonable for your OH to raise this with the employer, to point out that while he has, fortunately, been able to address the issue by getting his own RADAR key, there was a short term problem which was not addressed appropriately by the employer, and which is likely to arise again for other disabled employees or visitors.
Quite apart from anything else, what was OPs partner supposed to do if the manager had a day off, or was in a meeting?.
Employees are supposed to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees and customers. It's hard to think of *any* employer where paying £5 for a second key would not be reasonable.
And while the original issue may have been caused by stupidity not malice, the failure to address it when raised is a red flag
well for starters. Are disabled employees banned from the able bodied toilets?
Im still at a loss as to why the OPs OH didnt simply push the point they need a key0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards