We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

McMcKinsey believe households have lost out through QE

13»

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker



    doesn't really explain why is was 'doomed to fail' unless one takes the view that the world financial crisis was inevitable.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Well this is all a little bizzare.

    We needed QE to stop the entire economy collapsing.

    However, Northern Rock, a highly exposed bank, would have been just fine were it not for the pesky regulators, and would have, seemingly, stood the test of the economy collapsing.

    I'm paraphrasing, obviously, but some of you appear to be doign all you can to back up Hamish and his NR stuff, but finding in doing so, you are falling over yourselves and ignoring the fact that while you are talking of the entire economy collapsing to prove one point, you are trying to suggest everything would have been fine to prove another.

    Can't be both.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm paraphrasing, obviously, but some of you appear to be doign all you can to back up Hamish and his NR stuff, but finding in doing so, you are falling over yourselves and ignoring the fact that while you are talking of the entire economy collapsing to prove one point, you are trying to suggest everything would have been fine to prove another.

    Can't be both.
    At times like this it's probably best to to not post anything when you don't understand the bigger picture or the dynamics of the global financial crisis. The NR model works in a functioning liquid market with high demand, it doesn't work well in an illiquid market with inconsistent demand.
  • Scrootum
    Scrootum Posts: 159 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    doesn't really explain why is was 'doomed to fail' unless one takes the view that the world financial crisis was inevitable.
    A few people did know it was. It was a pretty open secret that trillions of derivative assets being held and traded by the large institutions were virtually worthless. It only required that fact to come out into the open and everything fell apart.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Scrootum wrote: »
    A few people did know it was. It was a pretty open secret that trillions of derivative assets being held and traded by the large institutions were virtually worthless. It only required that fact to come out into the open and everything fell apart.

    what did that have to do with the collapse of northern rock?
  • CLAPTON wrote: »
    what did that have to do with the collapse of northern rock?
    It was fairly clear to anyone that looked closely enough, that credit was going to dry up when it came to light that much of the security and assets offered as security were worth little or nothing.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Scrootum wrote: »
    It was fairly clear to anyone that looked closely enough, that credit was going to dry up when it came to light that much of the security and assets offered as security were worth little or nothing.


    it was pretty sudden

    not sure how clear the expectation was

    but no matter the referenced article didn't cover that anyway
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.