Elucidating loquacious ingenuitive titillating entrepreneurial - Bubbs’ Babes :):):)

Dizzy_Ditzy

wirehair wrote: »

The little packs of Splena sweeteners , 100 in a pack , yellow background dark brown container , bc 202827

Thank you lovely x

M4RT1N

Yoghurt_Queen wrote: »

That was a bit steep

I had a firearms on me at the time as I was out shooting

all was above board except I had wandered onto ALCOA British aluminium's property all 2 foot of it without realising it

the police was called buy security watching on cctv

the armed trespass charge was dropped and the gun was returned by the judge

but somebody has to pay there wages so I got fined for trespass:mad:

jimmylee1990

m4rtin wrote: »

Just to be clear, please be careful when you reply to op just in case there is any confusion. You are replying to M4RT1N not m4rtin. Theirs is all CAPS and has a 1 instead of an i at the end :beer:

Sorry bro!

jimmylee1990

M4RT1N wrote: »

maybe a nibble but then I remembered who it was baiting the hook

There's no bating here.

You started a discussion again regarding 'fraud' and failed to back up your argument with any evidence or proof.

Do not be forgetting our right in this country 'Presumption of innocence'
Hence the 'innocent until proven guilty'.

EMMAP

1.14 x ASDA Smartprice Chicken Wings by Weight per kg £2.50 £1.78

From a womble today A vs M

Perranlady

tweets wrote: »

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4819170

Link to Pandora on Achica thanks to op.

I was just about to post this - thanks
just to mention, over on the discount codes thread, £10 off a £60 spend or, 15% off code when you pay with Paypal -thanks to all

PL x

louj101

queen_of_cheap wrote: »

Did I read last night of someone saying that the face mask glitch in Mr Shoes works instore too? I have one that I could pop into on my way home, but its only a small-ish one so there's no guarantee that they'll have any

tried today and works :T:T:T

Dizzy_Ditzy

louj101 wrote: »

tried today and works :T:T:T

cheers ears

M4RT1N

Sir_Dodgy wrote: »

I am sure they could. But as far as we know they haven't and have not indicated they have, to the poster in question.

They held her in a room and forced her in a high pressure situation to sign something. They may as well rip that up now as it means nothing. They obtained a signature through fear.

I am not saying what the poster has done is right or wrong but I would say the shop have committed more of a crime than the poster.

They held her in a room and forced her in a high pressure situation to sign something. They may as well rip that up now as it means nothing

are you forgetting why she was there in the first place she was not innocent or just picked out at random

she was having them over and if you think the law will be on our side in favour of a corporation like Wal-Mart you are mistaken

Sir_Dodgy

tweets wrote: »

:spam: fritters with brown sauce nom nom :cool:

I hate it when I see people write that on forums and FB.

I have never heard anyone make that noise whilst eating. :rotfl: