📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

LGPS, non-income-tax payer, and tax relief

I've been to help an LGPS member analyse the benefits of an additional regular contributions contract, and I'm failing to understand the tax treatment.

The scheme's documentation on the ARC payments states that they're deducted from pay before income tax is calculated, thereby giving instant tax relief at the employee's marginal rate.

However, the employee in question is a low-paid part-timer, who pays no income tax on salary at all. Deducting the ARC payment from her salary gives no tax relief at all.

Indeed, looking at her payslips, I see that even the 6.5% normal employee contribution to LGPS is taken as 6.5% of her salary -- so there's no tax relief being applied there.

How does she get the tax relief? Does she have to make a claim to HMRC? Or is this some special case affecting occupational pensions which I known nothing about, whereby low-paid workers don't get any tax relief?

(My experience is entirely with tax relief on DC contributions, where an employer contribution of 6.5% would be deducted as 5.2% of net salary, and the pension scheme would claim the tax relief from HMRC. I know the world of DB is totally different, can anyone please enlighten me so I don't look like a complete idiot when trying to explain what's going on?)

Thanks.
Thus the old Gentleman ended his Harangue. The People heard it, and approved the Doctrine, and immediately practised the Contrary, just as if it had been a common Sermon; for the Vendue opened ...
THE WAY TO WEALTH, Benjamin Franklin, 1758 AD
«1

Comments

  • Drp8713
    Drp8713 Posts: 902 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts
    As far as im aware it is exactly as you say.

    Your contributions are taken gross, before tax is applied.

    If you dont pay tax, you dont get tax relief.

    I have never heard of anybody contacting HMRC to ask for it, as where would they pay it? Being final salary the contributions arnt used in the calc so getting the relief would just make the employer better off not the member
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,503 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 5 November 2013 at 5:41PM
    As I understand it non taxpayers can only get tax relief on contributions made to a RAS (relief at source) type scheme. The distinction isn't between DB and DC schemes, most occupational DC schemes also use "net pay" ie deduct pension conts from salary before applying tax.

    Maybe ask the scheme administrators, or use a personal pension instead of ARCs (though obviously weigh up the benefits, don't let the tax treatment be the only deciding factor!)
  • Drp8713 wrote: »
    I have never heard of anybody contacting HMRC to ask for it, as where would they pay it? Being final salary the contributions arnt used in the calc so getting the relief would just make the employer better off not the member

    HMRC would pay it to the employee in the form of a cheque, not to the employer. It's the pension-scheme member who made the contributions who gets the tax releif.

    Warmest regards,
    FA
    Thus the old Gentleman ended his Harangue. The People heard it, and approved the Doctrine, and immediately practised the Contrary, just as if it had been a common Sermon; for the Vendue opened ...
    THE WAY TO WEALTH, Benjamin Franklin, 1758 AD
  • Drp8713
    Drp8713 Posts: 902 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts
    HMRC would pay it to the employee in the form of a cheque, not to the employer. It's the pension-scheme member who made the contributions who gets the tax releif.

    Warmest regards,
    FA

    Yes, but what i mean is, in a personal pension I pay £100, the taxman pays £25 into the same scheme, my pension fund.

    In a DB scheme, the pension fund is not yours, its the employers to keep funded, if you pay your £100, the £25 would surely have to be paid into the same scheme, which would not benefit you as your getting 1/60th x service x FTE pay regardless.
  • Daniel54
    Daniel54 Posts: 837 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Drp8713 wrote: »
    Yes, but what i mean is, in a personal pension I pay £100, the taxman pays £25 into the same scheme, my pension fund.

    In a DB scheme, the pension fund is not yours, its the employers to keep funded, if you pay your £100, the £25 would surely have to be paid into the same scheme, which would not benefit you as your getting 1/60th x service x FTE pay regardless.

    In all the DB schemes I paid into,the employee contribution was paid gross to the employer and the employee would get a tax offset credited in the same payslip.

    Bear in mind the scheme is the responsibility of the trustees and is not owned by the employer.You are correct that it is the responsibility of the employer to keep the scheme sufficiently funded to pay the benefits,and the employer will in turn receive tax relief on it's contributions.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,640 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    HMRC would pay it to the employee in the form of a cheque, not to the employer. It's the pension-scheme member who made the contributions who gets the tax releif.

    Warmest regards,
    FA

    A non-taxpayer would normally be entitled to tax relief on £3600. Basic rate tax relief would normally be added to your pension contribution via your pension provider. As there is no pot of money in a defined benefit scheme, there is nowhere to pay it.
    Daniel54 wrote: »
    In all the DB schemes I paid into,the employee contribution was paid gross to the employer and the employee would get a tax offset credited in the same payslip.

    As the contribution is made before tax is taken, it just means a reduction in tax as opposed to a credit in tax.
  • This is one of those situations where an personal pension would probably be a better bet than an in house AVC.

    Assuming the member is looking to pay into a defined contribution arrangement where they get whatever is in the pot at retirement in the AVC then they will only get their own money plus growth.

    On the other hand, if they pay it into a personal pension, they will get tax relief on it even though they have paid no tax. Thus, as Jem16 suggests, if they paid £3,600 (the maximum a person with insufficient earnings to pay tax could put in), they would pay £2,880 per annum and HMRC would pay a further £620.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,640 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This is one of those situations where an personal pension would probably be a better bet than an in house AVC.

    It's not an AVC that's being looked at but an ARC which is the LGPS term for Additional pension - ie defined benefit.
  • hugo15
    hugo15 Posts: 120 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    This is just the question I have been meaning to ask for ages. My wife works as a school dinner lady and is a member of the LGPS. As part of our joint pension planning I have been thinking about ARC payments for her to boost her pension. If there is no tax relief is this still a good choice or are there better options?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.