MSE News: Energy firms will face 'competition test', PM says
Former_MSE_Helen
Posts: 2,382 Forumite
in Energy
"The Government is to launch a 'proper competition test' to see whether the energy market can be made more competitive..."
Read the full story:
Energy firms will face 'competition test', PM says
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
Energy firms will face 'competition test', PM says
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
Comments
-
Good. Hopefully something useful will come of it.0
-
Archna Luthra, MoneySavingExpert.com energy analyst, says: ...
"Currently it can take weeks to switch energy provider when all that changes is the bill payer – you can switch a bank account in seven days and a mobile contract even quicker. Suppliers are undermining the switching process and this must be remedied to shake up competition."
It should only take 7 days to switch supplier according to the regulator.
But that 7 days doesn't start until the expiry of the cooling off period.
Are you suggesting the cooling off period should be scrapped, making it easier for suppliers to slam other suppliers customers onto their own tariffs that may not be appropraite for their needs?
I don't think you will garner much support for that idea.0 -
Any thing that will help quick switching is a great move forward i agree it should not take 6-8 weeks that's ow long a mortgage takes for goddess sake, Its hardly a mortgage. I do fear this is just smoke and mirrors for the run up to the general election though.0
-
It should only take 7 days to switch supplier according to the regulator.
But that 7 days doesn't start until the expiry of the cooling off period.
Are you suggesting the cooling off period should be scrapped, making it easier for suppliers to slam other suppliers customers onto their own tariffs that may not be appropraite for their needs?
I don't think you will garner much support for that idea.
Nothing stopping the regulator ruling that the punter, if they so wish, can formally opt out of the min cooling off period in order to facilitate a quick switch. We all know the ridiculous wait for a G&E switch to happen is mostly down to deterring people from switching.0 -
MillicentBystander wrote: »Nothing stopping the regulator ruling that the punter, if they so wish, can formally opt out of the min cooling off period in order to facilitate a quick switch. We all know the ridiculous wait for a G&E switch to happen is mostly down to deterring people from switching.
Nothing at all.
But as I say, I don't think you will garner much support for such approach.0 -
I agree too, and so does the regulator who says it should not take any longer than 5 weeks currently
But this is the same regulator who in 2010 ordered npower to repay £1.2 million to its wronged punters for the gas sculpting scandal whereas Consumer Focus, who then took up the case, got them to pay £70 million back. So perhaps we shouldn't take their word as gospel?0 -
-
MillicentBystander wrote: »Nothing stopping the regulator ruling that the punter, if they so wish, can formally opt out of the min cooling off period in order to facilitate a quick switch. We all know the ridiculous wait for a G&E switch to happen is mostly down to deterring people from switching.
If you give customers the option of opting out of the cooling-off period, then they WILL be opted out by the salesman, whether the customer knows about it or not.
It's a green light for dodgy salesman to switch people with no chance to think about it.If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.0 -
Whilst I agree that speeding up the switching process will, hopefully, encourage consumers to switch more often, I don't think that will address the main issue here.
With energy prices rising at their current rate, even if the government removes all green taxes at a stroke (~10% of the bill) it will not significantly reduce prices in the future.
The question in my mind is: are we getting good value for the money spent, at our expense, on modernizing the energy infrastructure?Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.6K Spending & Discounts
- 235.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards