We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
interest only mortgages
storeton
Posts: 70 Forumite
I suppose this problem is going to occur a lot more times,
My parents interest free mortgage needs repaying in 4 years time when they reach 65,
They are not in a position to repay the £180k owed(value of property £250k).
They accept that the house must be sold.
My question as a family of three siblings,all gainfully employed,can we buy the property possibly on a buy to let mortgage and rent it back to my parents
How much deposit we we need
thanks for any information
My parents interest free mortgage needs repaying in 4 years time when they reach 65,
They are not in a position to repay the £180k owed(value of property £250k).
They accept that the house must be sold.
My question as a family of three siblings,all gainfully employed,can we buy the property possibly on a buy to let mortgage and rent it back to my parents
How much deposit we we need
thanks for any information
0
Comments
-
It's likely to cause problems:
1. Lenders don't like lending where the former owner remains in residence because it's far harder to repossess if needed.
2. This would have to be a regulated BTL mortgage because family are the tenants - fewer products around.
3. I believe (and may be corrected by others on here) that sale and rent back is effectively not permitted under present rules.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4793928 is a useful thread from someone whose parents are in a similar predicament.0 -
It's likely to cause problems:
1. Lenders don't like lending where the former owner remains in residence because it's far harder to repossess if needed.
2. This would have to be a regulated BTL mortgage because family are the tenants - fewer products around.
3. I believe (and may be corrected by others on here) that sale and rent back is effectively not permitted under present rules.
Apologies if I'm completely wrong but would one/both of the parents being on the joint mortgage resolve these issues? As an owner would be living there it wouldn't be a BTL or 'sale and rent back'. I can see there being an issue with the age of the parent, however being just 60 does give more leeway than if they were in their 70s.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards