The Extra Loveliest Individual's Team Expedition

MKS

zippydooda wrote: »

Come and get me ease xxxxxxxxxxx I'm in royal oak and pi55ed

Piddled, zippy, piddled. The Elite have standards to keep.:p

Tinyshoes

MKS wrote: »

Not a problem. Have you still got my number? Will be going to bed soon but will try and post it.

It shows as sent on my phone. :cool:

MKS

davemorton wrote: »

And if it does not touch the sides, saves cleaning the teeth , save on toothpaste :money:

Bit too mse, that one, Dave.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Goodnight, really have to go to bed.

davemorton

MKS wrote: »

Bit too mse, that one, Dave.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Goodnight, really have to go to bed.

NNOooooooooooo, we need the glass!!!!

Tinyshoes

davemorton wrote: »

NNOooooooooooo, we need the glass!!!!

And it's full. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

davemorton

Tinyshoes wrote: »

And it's full. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

You tease you, time to take Rebecca out, back in ten.

Savvybuyer

TrulyMadly wrote: »

Are you changing the way you see things savvy. I remember how black and white you used to be about prices and value. You seemed to concentrate on a unit price. Now you talk about triggers etc which adds another layer of complication:rotfl:

Still black and white I'm afraid:(. The introduction of triggers still ends up with an (in effect) price per unit on each item, and I use that to make the decisions about whether to add it or not.

:rotfl::rotfl:I am liking, really enjoying this APG shopping and the complexity to it all. Reminds me of one of my past lecturers who said (along the lines of) '...but in this situation it's not (this) it's (this instead)'. "No - that relates to X not to Y." And then I remember it doesn't apply in X situation, it's only in Y situation it applies. Very similar to the "no, that flavour is *not* versus Tesco, it's vs Sainsbury's instead." Really I'd love to butt in smart-alecky on anyone's shop that puts an item on the 'wrong' shop, but I resist!!:)

I've loving this 'those varieties vs M, the other one vs S, but not vs T, that one against either T or S and that one vs T only whilst the other vs S':rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:. Sort of sums up my mindset on all this.

I repeat...just so you're all jealous:D - I've never yet mixed up my shops, i.e. putting items vs T and S in the same shop (that weren't all not 10% cheaper than either M or W!).

:(Forgot now what I was talking about and someone's post I wanted to quote relevant to these points - or even what I now wanted to say there:rotfl::rotfl::):).

Tinyshoes

davemorton wrote: »

You tease you, time to take Rebecca out, back in ten.

I did send it, DD1 often gets photos ages after (smartphone) I have sent them whereas DD2 gets them straight away (Iphone).

I need to invest in some technology there have been so many pics I have wanted to share with you all. Garlic harvest, Apple harvest (over 300 fruit from one tree), my sunflower that magically appeared in the crack on my patio without anyone planting it.

My cookies and even my bathroom at times. Though not sure I would actually be brave enough for the last one.

fairclaire

Sent you a PM TS

davemorton

Tinyshoes wrote: »

I did send it, DD1 often gets photos ages after (smartphone) I have sent them whereas DD2 gets them straight away (Iphone).

I need to invest in some technology there have been so many pics I have wanted to share with you all. Garlic harvest, Apple harvest (over 300 fruit from one tree), my sunflower that magically appeared in the crack on my patio without anyone planting it.

My cookies and even my bathroom at times. Though not sure I would actually be brave enough for the last one.

Noticed how you slipped that one in........WHATEVA!!!