We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Historical SVRs vs. bank rate

redonion
redonion Posts: 215 Forumite
edited 19 September 2013 at 10:27PM in Mortgages & endowments
Since the differences between tracker rates and the base rate are now relatively high (especially for offsets!), I'm now wondering how SVRs have historically compared to interest rates when rates have been much higher.

For example, in the 70s and 80s when the base rate pushed 20% briefly, how did SVRs compare? I assume they were pretty close to the base rate?? And how about in more normal times with say 7% base rate?

I realise SVRs vary between lenders and products, but that doesn't mean there's nothing to know on this subject!

Perhaps this is the wrong question: after all, lifetime trackers are relatively easy to switch away from if rates rise by a lot.

Still, since a selling point of a lifetime tracker is that you don't need to remortgage, typical historical SVR/base rate offsets at times of "normal" base rates would be very interesting to know about.

Comments

  • I'd be inclined to rip up history on these things now. Banking and the economy has changed so much in the last decade I think any parallels could be misguided going forward
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    SVR's around 2% higher than base. Lenders now pay far higher levies. So in the future 2.25% to 2.5% could be the norm.
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    SVR's around 2% higher than base. Lenders now pay far higher levies. So in the future 2.25% to 2.5% could be the norm.
    ...and the offset lifetime tracker rates I've seen are about 3.2% above base!

    Having second thoughts about getting one of those, partly for that reason. Every time I think about mortgages I find out something new and change my mind!

    The other reason is that the choice is limited and my broker recommended Abbey - and I've heard bad things about Santander messing people around.
  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    I have no recollection of base rate hitting 20%.

    That said, base v SVR will, I believe, settle in a range of 2% - 3% apart once we move away from this artificially low base rate.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,439 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The highest "normal" SVR I can remember for building societies was 15.4% around 1990. They kept rates artificially low, while wholesale funders and the clearing bank SVRs were higher.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.