We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

csa backpay-very confused - very long

Options
2»

Comments

  • Maybe your ex should have got a job and earned her money?
    ++

    Maybe she should have - but she didn't back then (nor anytime since - if I remember correctly).

    ++
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So you could have given her the money and the benefits she received for the children could have been reduced by £70 accordingly. What difference would that have made?
  • FBaby wrote: »
    So you could have given her the money and the benefits she received for the children could have been reduced by £70 accordingly. What difference would that have made?
    ++

    After misregarding the first £10 not a great deal. I know it's largely academic now as things are markedly different.

    It also used to frustrate me when I'd see politicians on the TV going on about how chasing absent parents for maintenance would help lift the children from broken relationships out of poverty (working on the principle the most single parents didn't work and 'lived' on benefits).

    From my own experience it did nothing of the sort - it was (as indicated by others above) actually about reducing the strain on the public purse and nothing to do with helping reduce poverty or taking responsibility.

    As far as I could see (from back then) - no-one involved in my case was any better off. The PWC stayed on a benefit level of income (yes - she could have found a job or changed her lifestyle), my income was reduced to little more than benefit level and the public purse was reduced by an infinitesimal % which was more than counteracted by the £000 millions spent on broken ICT systems, cases written off for being too expensive to chase and other expenses.

    But hey ho - that was then and things are different now...

    I think that's enough on that!

    ++
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.