We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Mortgages at most affordable for 14 years
Comments
-
If they use 70% all the time then that's what matters it's a comparison over time.
Precisely right.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Precisely right.
A perfect example of tautology, Hamish.
[Look it up. I doesn't mean the study of elastic]0 -
Be i bit odd if it was any different with IRs being the the lowest they have ever been.0
-
What a strange comment.Thrugelmir wrote: »I'm sure there's a degree of nervousness. As no one is sure what the future holds. Expectations are that rates will move in 2015 possibly. With a new 25 mortgage there's many years to go for those taking out a mortgage now.
Surely people want to take out their mortgages when mortgage rates are lower allowing them to repay capital quicker.
Only a fool would wait until mortgage rates were higher before taking one out. The double whammy of house prices rising would be a massive blow, even if house prices fell you would have more than likely have saved money.0 -
If they use 70% all the time then that's what matters it's a comparison over time.
No, its not. 70% is just an average. In any given year the actual LTV could vary by quite a bit either side of the value so this comparison of affordability it nothing more than an academic exercise based on a very crude model of reality.0 -
thescouselander wrote: »No, its not. 70% is just an average. In any given year the actual LTV could vary by quite a bit either side of the value so this comparison of affordability it nothing more than an academic exercise based on a very crude model of reality.
the formula used depnds upon what you want to measure/know
what do you what to measure?
what formula do you want to use?0 -
thescouselander wrote: »No, its not. 70% is just an average.
The point is that the series uses the same criteria over time to provide a consistent measure.In any given year the actual LTV could vary by quite a bit either side of the value so this comparison of affordability it nothing more than an academic exercise based on a very crude model of reality.
Or in other words.... "individual circumstances may vary".
I'm glad you explained that this is just a representative data series based on averages.
I had assumed that every single buyer in Britain bought identical houses at identical prices on identical incomes until you cleared that up.
Phew...:o“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »The point is that the series uses the same criteria over time to provide a consistent measure.
Or in other words.... "individual circumstances may vary".
I'm glad you explained that this is just a representative data series based on averages.
I had assumed that every single buyer in Britain bought identical houses at identical prices on identical incomes until you cleared that up.
Phew...:o
The point is a "measure" of what? The stats have simplified things down so much is it not representative of reality. It is only a measure of affordability within an oversimplified model of the housing market.0 -
thescouselander wrote: »The point is a "measure" of what? The stats have simplified things down so much is it not representative of reality. It is only a measure of affordability within an oversimplified model of the housing market.
yes of course it is :
what sort of information do you want to have ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
