We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Will all 75% plus mortgages be forced into the government's new scheme ?
property.advert
Posts: 4,087 Forumite
Come January next year, will all folks looking for LTV mortgages of more than 75% be forced into the new lending scheme ?
Now I know this is only for properties up to £600,000 but if the government makes lots of hoops to jump through to qualify for the assistance, what will happen to folk who would rather not use such a scheme ?
Now I know this is only for properties up to £600,000 but if the government makes lots of hoops to jump through to qualify for the assistance, what will happen to folk who would rather not use such a scheme ?
0
Comments
-
There's no obligation for lenders to offer the scheme. There's a very specific objective with this scheme. It's not an open ended commitment to underwriting 95% mortgages either. Those with the neccessary finance will be better off outside of the scheme. As the "loan" will need to be indemnified in some way. More than likely with a loading to the interest rates on offer.0
-
You don't have to use the scheme. As far as I'm aware in theory it allows people with low deposits gain access to better mortgage rates and to able to afford a better property than they could with a small deposit.
Will the mortgage rates change if more people could potentially buy, who knows.:hello:0 -
I'm sure if you had a real 25% deposit you would get a better rate than those who use help to buy.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
It's an interesting question.
From a banks point of view getting 20% of the loan guaranteed by the government will make the loan less risky.
From the borrowers point of view, the fact that interest is not charged on the 'government loan' part means that it should be cheaper.
It does seem to be that it makes sense for everyone to be in the scheme if they can.0 -
I'm sure if you had a real 25% deposit you would get a better rate than those who use help to buy.
Well that depends. It may be better to use the government interest free 20% loan and put your real money to better use (or make large overpayments soon after taking the mortgage).
Only negative is that the 20% owned by the Govt. is an equity stake, so they share in any rise (but also, possibly, in any fall) in house prices.
So actually there is another possible benefit, it provides a hedge against house price falls. Your 'real' cash is safe.
(all the above is based on a cursory glance at the schemes, I will certainly look in more detail once I see some actual examples of mortgages available.)0 -
Another point.
Will a bank prefer someone with a low deposit (say 10%) to be in the scheme? Maybe they will. As then they know that it will be more affordable (20% is interest free), and the government guarantee is there.
So it is in fact possible that for loans 75% LTV+ the rates will be higher. As banks will be wary of NOT using the scheme.0 -
From a banks point of view getting 20% of the loan guaranteed by the government will make the loan less risky.
The Government will cover only potential losses on the loans by levying a charge. This most likely will be recovered by the lender charging a higher rate of interest on the product.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The Government will cover only potential losses on the loans by levying a charge. This most likely will be recovered by the lender charging a higher rate of interest on the product.
True, but is this more (or less) risky that the alternative, which is rely on the borrower for all the loan? Bearing in mind that for loans of 75% ltv the security may not be sufficient after legal costs / auction etc.
I think that the affordability thing may be the main thing though. Given that the 20% is interest free, and then is low interest on the 6th year. It is possible that the overall monthly interest cost to the customer will be less.
However that requires actual examples of rates.0 -
Yet again, people are confusing the current HTB Equity Loan (newbuild only) and HTB Mortgage Guarantee (newbuild & existing) which starts in January.
With MG there is no interest-free loan. It is a upto 95% mortgage with a guarantee from the Government to encourage lenders to lend more at higher LTV and with relaxed capital requirements.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
There is no "interest free" part here, simply a government backed equivalent to the old mortgage guarantee premiums which banks loved to push.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
