We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
The difference between the US and UK
Graham_Devon
Posts: 58,560 Forumite
When it comes to mortgage debt liability.
The US seems to be successfuly reducing mortgage liability, and continues to do so.
However, the UK never did actually reduce liability and it continues to increase.
The graph shows that for 20 years, mortgage liability rose at the same rate in the US as it did in the UK.
Who is in the better position now? Quite a telling graph IMO. With the schemes we have in place the gap is only going to increase. Are we now on our own?

The US seems to be successfuly reducing mortgage liability, and continues to do so.
However, the UK never did actually reduce liability and it continues to increase.
The graph shows that for 20 years, mortgage liability rose at the same rate in the US as it did in the UK.
Who is in the better position now? Quite a telling graph IMO. With the schemes we have in place the gap is only going to increase. Are we now on our own?

0
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »However, the UK never did actually reduce liability and it continues to increase.
The graph shows that for 20 years, mortgage liability rose at the same rate in the US as it did in the UK.
A lot of the liabilities were simply written off in the US. I'm not sure that there's any evidence to show that US consumers have been more active in paying down mortgages when compared to the average Brit.0 -
Well if the worst comes to the worst in the UK we can always kick people out of their homes and knock them down. That should help maintain house prices.0
-
For a "market" to operate, people need to be kicked out of their homes. Think we are too sentimental here.0
-
Looking at recent reports of eye-watering HPI rates in the US those graphs should be heading back to convergence soon.0
-
Average debt per homeowner may give more insight.0
-
Quite a lot of lending in the USA is non-recourse.
So the debts have been wiped off, and everyone walks away happy.
The situation is different in the UK.. I am not really sure what the right level of mortgage debt is. As a society we presumably want there to be some.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Who is in the better position now? Quite a telling graph IMO. With the schemes we have in place the gap is only going to increase. Are we now on our own?
Clearly shows that we pay far more for property in the UK than the US , for a whole variety of reasons.
Not sure that comparisons have any meaning anyway. The issue with UK mortgage debt levels has been well documented since 2007. The level of debt will fall. More a question of how long it will take.0 -
It'd be interesting to see the graph in real (inflation adjusted) terms. IIRC, UK inflation had been high than in the US over the period.0
-
Don't forget the US will have increased its housing stock by a considerable proportion over the period whereas the UK has not so the UK debt per property will have risen even faster relatively.
However what Graham doesn't understand is it is a matter of supply and demand - if I have to pay 80% of my take home to put a roof over my family and forgo almost everything else in life then I will. In the US the price of a house far exceeding the build cost results in more houses being built, a lot more, until there is a glut (and a price crash). In the UK it makes no difference to the supply.I think....0 -
Don't forget the US will have increased its housing stock by a considerable proportion over the period whereas the UK has not so the UK debt per property will have risen even faster relatively.
However what Graham doesn't understand is it is a matter of supply and demand - if I have to pay 80% of my take home to put a roof over my family and forgo almost everything else in life then I will. In the US the price of a house far exceeding the build cost results in more houses being built, a lot more, until there is a glut (and a price crash). In the UK it makes no difference to the supply.
I think that's the point of the changes to the planning laws the Tories are making. It's an attempt to make supply more responsive to price signals.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
