We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

LTV when remotgaging


Hi everyone, I’ve read these boards for several years nowbut this is the first time I’ve posted. I’m hoping someone can give me some advice on how to value my house whenI remortgage.

I bought my house for £129,000 in October 2009. I expect the mortgage to have around £101,000left on it when my current deal ends. This would mean a LTV of around 78%. I’ve only made cosmetic changes since so I don’t believe I’ve added anyvalue to the house myself.

However when I bought the house the previous owner was inthe process of part exchanging it for a new build. As there was a slight delay in my mortgage goingthrough the house is recorded as having been sold twice within a month. In September 2009 it is recorded as being soldfor £139,000 (which I presume is the price the builders paid the original owner)and then a month later the £129,000 I paid. If the house was to be valued at around £139,000 this would bring theLTV down to below 75% so I’m not really sure what LTV I should be looking at –75% or 80%?

I know that when I remortgage the new mortgage company willrevalue the house. Are they likely to considerthe earlier sold value or will they just look at what I paid for it? Equivalent houses within the street have soldsince I bought for £138,000 (September 2010), £152,500 (January 2012) and£142,000 (June 2012) so I do think the house is probably worth more than£129,000 but obviously the last of thesesales was a year ago and so I’m not sure how relevant they are. There are also no equivalent houses beingadvertised for sale at the moment so I can’t use for sale prices as a guide andthe houses that have sold within half a mileof the house more recently are not that comparable as they are either bigger or ex councilwhich my house is not.

Thanks in advance for any advice given

Julie

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Julielou56 wrote: »
    In September 2009 it is recorded as being soldfor £139,000 (which I presume is the price the builders paid the original owner)and then a month later the £129,000 I paid.

    Price of the new property would have been inflated. The builder didn't knowingly lose £10k.
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    If the houses in the street are anything to go by, a new valuation might just get you just under that 75% mark. Or could you chuck in a few thousand to tip the balance if not?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.