We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Spending money to save money
OffGridLiving
Posts: 585 Forumite
I was reading an interesting article in an inflight magazine yesterday (sorry, I can't remember the name of the mag) that mentioned spending money to save money.
It was US centric but basically discussed that the average US car was over 10 years old and that with increases in engine efficiency, high fuel costs and such low interest rates on car finance, buying a car actually made more money than leaving the cash in a savings account.
Clearly this all depends on how much mileage you do, with more mileage giving a better return on your investment due to efficiency savings, but I was wondering whether the 'spend to save' was also true over here, especially given we pay far more for fuel than the US?
It was US centric but basically discussed that the average US car was over 10 years old and that with increases in engine efficiency, high fuel costs and such low interest rates on car finance, buying a car actually made more money than leaving the cash in a savings account.
Clearly this all depends on how much mileage you do, with more mileage giving a better return on your investment due to efficiency savings, but I was wondering whether the 'spend to save' was also true over here, especially given we pay far more for fuel than the US?
0
Comments
-
I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?I am not a cat (But my friend is)0
-
I think most older American cars are all 5 litre plus V8's doing about 12-15 miles to the gallon which was fine when their petrol was only about 50 -70p a gallon(equivalent).
With prices of petrol rising dramatically over the past few years in the US these cars are really hurting the pocket.
In the UK our cars have been much more efficient for much longer so this doesn't really apply to us.0 -
-
I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?
14,000 @ 40mpg = 350 gallon per year
14,000 @ 53mpg = 264 gallon per year
Savings: 86 gallon per year
Price per Gallon: £6.10
Savings per year: £524.60
Time to recoup £9,000: 17 years
0 -
marathonic wrote: »14,000 @ 40mpg = 350 gallon per year
14,000 @ 53mpg = 264 gallon per year
Savings: 86 gallon per year
Price per Gallon: £6.10
Savings per year: £524.60
Time to recoup £9,000: 17 years
Not really a great return if it is taken on finance as well. :eek:0 -
OffGridLiving wrote: »Was the new car bought on finance?
No, but I've lost 3% savings interest on the cash.I am not a cat (But my friend is)0 -
Most things are getting more efficient - cars, household goods, houses etc.
Therefore the day to day running costs will generally be cheaper if a modern item is purchased.
The difficulty is deciding what payback period is acceptable. If the payback period is longer than the anticipated life of the replacement item, say a washing machine, then the original item may as well be run into the ground even though it costs more to run.0 -
Most things are getting more efficient - cars, household goods, houses etc.
Therefore the day to day running costs will generally be cheaper if a modern item is purchased.
The difficulty is deciding what payback period is acceptable. If the payback period is longer than the anticipated life of the replacement item, say a washing machine, then the original item may as well be run into the ground even though it costs more to run.
But by then it may well cost more than £9,000 to replace so timiming is also a factor.
If you can replace immediately before a peruiod of inflation then the whole transaction will look much cheaper.The only thing that is constant is change.0 -
shortchanged wrote: »Not really a great return if it is taken on finance as well. :eek:
Definitely not… although there are other factors to consider – increased comfort, possible reduction in maintenance costs, etc.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards