We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Spending money to save money

I was reading an interesting article in an inflight magazine yesterday (sorry, I can't remember the name of the mag) that mentioned spending money to save money.

It was US centric but basically discussed that the average US car was over 10 years old and that with increases in engine efficiency, high fuel costs and such low interest rates on car finance, buying a car actually made more money than leaving the cash in a savings account.

Clearly this all depends on how much mileage you do, with more mileage giving a better return on your investment due to efficiency savings, but I was wondering whether the 'spend to save' was also true over here, especially given we pay far more for fuel than the US?
«1

Comments

  • Alter_ego
    Alter_ego Posts: 3,842 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?
    I am not a cat (But my friend is)
  • shortchanged_2
    shortchanged_2 Posts: 5,546 Forumite
    I think most older American cars are all 5 litre plus V8's doing about 12-15 miles to the gallon which was fine when their petrol was only about 50 -70p a gallon(equivalent).

    With prices of petrol rising dramatically over the past few years in the US these cars are really hurting the pocket.

    In the UK our cars have been much more efficient for much longer so this doesn't really apply to us.
  • Alter_ego wrote: »
    I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?

    Was the new car bought on finance?
  • nicko33
    nicko33 Posts: 1,125 Forumite
    Alter_ego wrote: »
    I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?
    you save about 86 gallons per year
    17.5 years assuming £6 per gallon
  • marathonic
    marathonic Posts: 1,789 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Alter_ego wrote: »
    I recently traded in a 40mpg car for a 53mpg car. How long to get my £9000 back at 14000 miles a year?


    14,000 @ 40mpg = 350 gallon per year
    14,000 @ 53mpg = 264 gallon per year

    Savings: 86 gallon per year

    Price per Gallon: £6.10
    Savings per year: £524.60

    Time to recoup £9,000: 17 years

    :D
  • shortchanged_2
    shortchanged_2 Posts: 5,546 Forumite
    marathonic wrote: »
    14,000 @ 40mpg = 350 gallon per year
    14,000 @ 53mpg = 264 gallon per year

    Savings: 86 gallon per year

    Price per Gallon: £6.10
    Savings per year: £524.60

    Time to recoup £9,000: 17 years

    :D

    Not really a great return if it is taken on finance as well. :eek:
  • Alter_ego
    Alter_ego Posts: 3,842 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Was the new car bought on finance?

    No, but I've lost 3% savings interest on the cash.
    I am not a cat (But my friend is)
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Most things are getting more efficient - cars, household goods, houses etc.

    Therefore the day to day running costs will generally be cheaper if a modern item is purchased.

    The difficulty is deciding what payback period is acceptable. If the payback period is longer than the anticipated life of the replacement item, say a washing machine, then the original item may as well be run into the ground even though it costs more to run.
  • zygurat789
    zygurat789 Posts: 4,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Most things are getting more efficient - cars, household goods, houses etc.

    Therefore the day to day running costs will generally be cheaper if a modern item is purchased.

    The difficulty is deciding what payback period is acceptable. If the payback period is longer than the anticipated life of the replacement item, say a washing machine, then the original item may as well be run into the ground even though it costs more to run.

    But by then it may well cost more than £9,000 to replace so timiming is also a factor.
    If you can replace immediately before a peruiod of inflation then the whole transaction will look much cheaper.
    The only thing that is constant is change.
  • marathonic
    marathonic Posts: 1,789 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Not really a great return if it is taken on finance as well. :eek:

    Definitely not… although there are other factors to consider – increased comfort, possible reduction in maintenance costs, etc.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.