We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Made bankrupt by Lowells
Options
Comments
-
I just wanted too add something here, Im surprised Vanquis said they dont sell accounts as my Vanquis account was sold to Lowell. It was deffinatly sold as the account name and Default changed to Lowell on my credit file.
I do find it nasty that Lowell can do this without you knowing anything about it and having a chance to defend.
I really do wish you good luck in getting the BR annulled
[STRIKE]DFD - 24th October 2015[/STRIKE] [STRIKE]DFD - 24th March 2015 [/STRIKE]
DEBT FREE 24.03.15
0 -
bump.....for my previous post :j0
-
Hi
Fevlo - Not sure why vanquis would have said this to me then that they do not sell debts - I actually have the conversation recorded on my phone with them saying this??? Lowell are on my credit file as the creditor.
Brock and Roll - I am trying to claim annulment under 'ought not have been made' and additionally I am claiming that I am solvent in respect that I could have come to an arrangement with them, which is regarded by the OFT that all avenues to collect are to be taken prior to taking such drastic action as BR0 -
Hi everyone - just an update on my previous posts with me vs Lowell
I have since sent the forms off to the courts to ask for it to be annuled on the grounds the order ought not to have been made - no date set yet.
However, BW Legal / Lowell have said 3x to me on a telephone conversation that I recorded that they will send out the Notice of Assignments for the original debts - still have not had these.
They have also said that they will assess the case when it comes through from the courts for annulment and maybe come up with another solution and agree to the annulment as this would be better than fighting and toing and froing in court??? But they are unable to do this until it is official from the courts first.
Why would they do this if they are so damn sure that they had followed procedures in the first place.
Any opinions or thoughts would be greatly appreciated right now0 -
When did you apply on an N244 to set aside the bankruptcy order?
DDDebt Doctor, Debt caseworker, Citizens' Advice Bureau .
Impartial debt advice services: Citizens Advice Bureau Find your local CAB *** National Debtline - Tel: 0808 808 4000*** BSC No. 100 ***0 -
Hi DD
I applied for the bankruptcy to be annuled 3 days after the OR contacted me and that being the first time I knew about it.
I have phoned the courts for a date but it is up with listings at the moment awaiting a date allocation.0 -
Also, they originally sent back the application for annulment because I had not used the correct form - they sent me form 71A.0
-
You have applied for annulment of the bankruptcy where my suggestion was to set aside the bankruptcy order, which are completely different things. (maybe the court wouldn't accept the set aside application?)
With a set aside,if done 'in good time' - which means almost immediately you became aware, then it is usually the quickest and cheapest way to get it back to the court before costs start to occur.
Costs have now begun to occur, The IS fees and others will need to be satisfied by someone. The IS will attend the hearing (to protect their position) but the hearing is essentially a dispute between you and the creditor.
It really is a case of the earlier the better for you.
DDDebt Doctor, Debt caseworker, Citizens' Advice Bureau .
Impartial debt advice services: Citizens Advice Bureau Find your local CAB *** National Debtline - Tel: 0808 808 4000*** BSC No. 100 ***0 -
I was just wondering if anyone can give me advice on what they think.......
I now have my bankruptcy annulment date with the courts - 19th September - however I received a letter today from the Insolvency
Service with a copy letter to the courts saying.....
The Official Receiver does not intend any disrespect to the court but does not propose to attend the hearing so as to save costs.
The Official Receiver would however request that a provision be made for the payment of his costs in any annulment order, if one were to be made. The Official Receivers costs to date are £161.
Would I be jumping the gun in assuming that this could be a good sign that the annulment may be granted?
Any help or advice much appreciated as usual.0 -
slightly off topic but you've mentioned twice that you've recorded telephone calls - did you say at the start of the call that you were recording it? It is illegal to record calls without informing those concerned that you are doing so (that's why there is always that 'calls may be recorded' bit when you call a call centre)All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards