We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Anatole Kaletsky - Osborne's house price boom likely to work
Comments
-
Great demand for something that has its capital entirely paid for by taxpayers and requires a rent subsidy in perpetuity. Plenty of "loss" there.
There is great demand whether or not council housing is built/provided.
The government provides HB to assist people wholly or partly to fund a supply of property to meet that demand.
Plenty of loss there too.
Question is it the direct provision of property, by the government, more costly than paying somebody else to provide it and make a profit from it, after paying commercially higher rates of interest than the government can. Effectively the government is using taxpayers money to buy assets for someone else.
The private sector has never risen to the challenge of meeting that demand in the volumes required hence we have a problem."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
grizzly1911 wrote: »The private sector has never risen to the challenge of meeting that demand in the volumes required hence we have a problem.
The cause of the problem lies squarely with government(s).
Population growth and lack of housing didn't just happen yesterday.
Government managed to make some drastic pension changes based on changing demographics. They managed to grasp the fact that future workers may struggle to pay for future pensioners but seem to have given little thought to where they might live.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards