We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Un-mortgagable property - solicitor should have known?

2»

Comments

  • Thank you Holly - like I say, I know we sound naive and I've never tried to reclaim money in my life - I just cant help but think that if they had done their job a bit more thoroughly / quickly I might still be in my own home. And that's the kind of thought that keeps a girl awake at night... x
  • holly_hobby
    holly_hobby Posts: 5,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Although you must also accept that the choice to proceed with your own sale, without even having a mge offer on your own purchase, was ulitmately your own.

    Anyhoo see what results from your complaint.

    Hope this helps

    Holly
  • Let_Us_See
    Let_Us_See Posts: 1,319 Forumite
    I have the fullest sympathy with your position, but were you made aware of a covenant by the selling agent on initial inquiry? If so, you should have investigated thoroughly before making any offer, and if not, I would have a word with the selling agent and ask "why not."
  • Let_Us_See
    Let_Us_See Posts: 1,319 Forumite
    PS. Also worth checking if the owner had a mortgage, and if so, who was the lender?
  • Thank you - yes, we were aware of it and (other than the obvious!!!) it would not have affected us. It essentially stated that if we built a house on the land we would have to pay the seller 40% of the profits. We had no intention of building, ever. We told PPL about it when they took on the case, asked them to look in to it again at the beginning of January - but they said it wasn't a problem. The owner did have a mortgage with Nationwide, but apparently criteria are so strict these days even they would not lend on it now...
  • foxwales
    foxwales Posts: 590 Forumite
    Solicitors act under your instruction. If they weren't performing to your satisfaction, you should have dismissed them and appointed another solicitor.

    There doesn't appear to be a claim for negligence here unless you can prove that they informed you the Covenant was trivial and just a formality.

    Your only avenue of recourse would be through the civil court, once you have exhausted avenues of potential recompense and evidence gathering from the solicitors.

    I don't think you have much chance of bringing a case against the solicitors firm i'm afraid.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.