We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Which option is better?

Hi,

Mortgage is up for renewal and my current lender has offered :

2yrs at 2.79%+£624

with fee added £512.37 without £509.65 /m

2yrs at 2.99%+£125

With 522.49 without 521.93 /m

No additional or hidden fees at all.

Wondering whats best method to work out which is better. I think the 2.99% is better.

Thanks.

Comments

  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Well assume that the debt at the end will be the same, which it should. Be if the repayment period is the same, then the higher fee is cheaper.

    What ltv, multiplier of salary and general credit history do you have. It sounds as though these are pretty good, in which case I personally don't see much point in a two year fix. Base rates ain't going anywhere quickly so I'd be looking at either a tracker or a five year fix, the problem with two year fixes is that you're stumping up another fee in two years for the next deal as well.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.