We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Scathing attack on help to buy
Comments
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Not mask it but provide stability. Markets hate uncertainty. Once consumers lose confidence then they will act lemmings.
The housing market has been pretty stable since 2008.
Many economic experts seem to feel a need to re-introduce instability.
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
The housing market has been pretty stable since 2008.
Ask yourself why? Could it be the enormous liability that has been transfered to the taxpayer in terms of mortgage debt. At the point RBS and HBOS were nationalised, including Northern Rock along with Bradford & Bingley. The UK taxpayer was on the hook for 45% of outstanding mortgage debt or around £540 billion pounds.
A sharp fall in house prices would have been terminal for the UK. As the banks would have simply collapsed.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Ask yourself why? Could it be the enormous liability that has been transfered to the taxpayer in terms of mortgage debt. At the point RBS and HBOS were nationalised, including Northern Rock along with Bradford & Bingley. The UK taxpayer was on the hook for 45% of outstanding mortgage debt or around £540 billion pounds.
A sharp fall in house prices would have been terminal for the UK. As the banks would have simply collapsed.
A sharp fall in house prices was avoided because of negative equity.
Having been mis-sold mortgages in excess of 100% etc etc, borrowers had no choice but to refuse low offers.
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
I think its a great idea.
Anything that puts people in homes.
At the end of the day it will get prices to rise. That's all that matters.We love Sarah O Grady0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards