We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Santander mortgage shocker! Advice or similar experiences wanted please.

2»

Comments

  • HIGH
    HIGH Posts: 4 Newbie
    loadieboy wrote: »
    Shortening the term was suggested by the Santander rep. The sums involved (having 50K to pay off a £120K loan) meant that only paying off the extra 10% over standard repayments per year (which i also did) would have taken an awful lot longer.

    Can you underpay on the mortgage based on the extra 10% that you have been paying off?

    This would give you time to look around for a re-mortgage.
  • ValHaller
    ValHaller Posts: 5,212 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    That depends on your personal financial circumstances. Lenders ultimately have the final say. If they no longer want your business then remortgaging elsewhere is your only real alternative.
    Nah. They have reneged on a verbal understanding and changed a written deal without written authority, I say that this should go to the FOS and the original term should be restored. Lenders might have the final say, but that is within the constraints of the written deal and any variations they have written evidence for.
    You might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ValHaller wrote: »
    Nah. They have reneged on a verbal understanding and changed a written deal without written authority, I say that this should go to the FOS and the original term should be restored. Lenders might have the final say, but that is within the constraints of the written deal and any variations they have written evidence for.

    Borrower wanted to avoid paying an ERC so shortened term. Borrower now wishes to pay less a month so wishes to extend term.

    Banks says tough, you can't have your cake an eat it.

    A verbal conversation does not constitute a contract. As the terms could change at any time.
  • ValHaller
    ValHaller Posts: 5,212 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Borrower wanted to avoid paying an ERC so shortened term. Borrower now wishes to pay less a month so wishes to extend term.

    Banks says tough, you can't have your cake an eat it.

    A verbal conversation does not constitute a contract. As the terms could change at any time.
    There you go again, defending the indefensible. It is an unacceptable way of conducting business.

    Bank actually says you can have new cake while it lasts and then go back to old cake. New cake runs out and bank refuses to allow old cake. If you really need this explaining in terms of cake.
    You might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.