Every last impecuniosity totally exterminated

artha

aau1 wrote: »

WE is different to dr O again

They issued X amount of MOCs, someone copies it and suddenly there are more in circulation than there should be and so MOC is recalled and supermarkrts advised

My point has mind of been lost bow. I dont care what leople did back in andrex lromo days

My point is that dr O printed sk many promotional packs and has budgeted for so many of them to be tKen up

s ling as people arent photocopyng the MKCs and using them repeatedly then there sill be less than the maximum losible in circulation

(Am in agony now. Think i'll give uo for the night (or stick to one sord posts )

As has been said before, I think, these promos are normally well thought out with a budget that can accommodate the expected take up. Its when the expected take up is more than anticipated or there is a loophole to exploit that things go pear shaped. If things do go pear shaped there is probably little they can do if the codes/ purchases are genuine and T&Cs have been adhered to. They can of course withdraw the promotional packs but whilst they are there you can probably continue.

David.

aau1 wrote: »

Does anyone? :rotfl:

I saw them rtc in A at 10p lsdt week

What price where they about £2 odd in Tesco at the time

aau1

David. wrote: »

If I knew what language that was I would run it through google translate
I have lost your point in all of this
My point about ww was as I remember and it could be totally wrong was it not a coupon sent out to certain individuals for whatever reason.
That was then hammered by the internet community so if I was ww I would think long and hard and tie down any coupons in the future if I used them ever again.

Wise man once said

"Spell checker needed and that's not you"

aau1

fairclaire wrote: »

:eek::eek: is that you admitting you are wrong :eek::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Never! :eek:

Merely agreeing to move past it

fairclaire

artha wrote: »

As has been said before, I think, these promos are normally well thought out with a budget that can accommodate the expected take up. Its when the expected take up is more than anticipated or there is a loophole to exploit that things go pear shaped. If things do go pear shaped there is probably little they can do if the codes/ purchases are genuine and T&Cs have been adhered to. They can of course withdraw the promotional packs but whilst they are there you can probably continue.

sorry Artha

David.

aau1 wrote: »

Wise man once said

"Spell checker needed and that's not you"

Again auau1 its all in the detail
:shhh:
Spell checker needed and that's not you

fairclaire

aau1 wrote: »

Never! :eek:

Merely agreeing to move past it

thought so :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Tinyshoes

David. wrote: »

What price where they about £2 odd in Tesco at the time

£1.49 and the coupons scanned at £2.99, they did eventually go up to that price when the half price offer finished in the Extras. The best stores to get them in were the superstores as a discontinued line were 75p. I didn't find that out until after, would have been worth the petrol.

aau1

David. wrote: »

Someone said she rang up her docs whilst away and got them to fax etc a prescription to the chemist where she was. Might be worth a try;)

Ooh. Might give it a try

:beer:

David.

artha wrote: »

As has been said before, I think, these promos are normally well thought out with a budget that can accommodate the expected take up. Its when the expected take up is more than anticipated or there is a loophole to exploit that things go pear shaped. If things do go pear shaped there is probably little they can do if the codes/ purchases are genuine and T&Cs have been adhered to. They can of course withdraw the promotional packs but whilst they are there you can probably continue.

Evening/Morning/Afternoon artha depending when you read this