We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Wealthy Britons pay 10% more in tax
IronWolf
Posts: 6,445 Forumite
Who said the government wasnt clamping down on tax evasion
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578436911705743072.html
U.K. Treasury chief George Osborne claimed a small victory Monday in his fight to tackle tax evasion, as the country's tax department netted a 10% increase in the revenue it raised from wealthy Britons last year.
The tax department's specialist unit dealing with the tax affairs of the 5,800 wealthiest people in Britain—each of whom have assets in excess of £20 million ($30.5 million)—brought in £220 million in tax revenue in the past tax year, which ended on April 5. This compares with the £200 million raised in 2011-12 tax year
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578436911705743072.html
Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
0
Comments
-
Who said the government wasnt clamping down on tax evasion
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578436911705743072.html
Erm, 5800 x 20mill = £116 bill
Tax of £200mill is less than 0.2% of assets - ie negligible
Somebody got their decimal points in a twist ?????
As a unit of measure, tax take vs assets sounds meaningless0 -
Old_Slaphead wrote: »Erm, 5800 x 20mill = £116 bill
Tax of £200mill is less than 0.2% of assets - ie negligible
Somebody got their decimal points in a twist ?????
As a unit of measure, tax take vs assets sounds meaningless
£116bn/5800?
The 1,000 richest people in Britain and Ireland share a wealth of £450bn
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22233389
Plenty more to go at."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
This would have been at 50%, I wonder if these amounts were included in the famous calculation to prove that less tax was collected because of the 50% additional rate.The only thing that is constant is change.0
-
£200m to £220m is 10%Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0
-
£220m tax / 5800 people = £38k tax each
Doesn't really sound like all that much tax to be paying
What's wrong with this picture?0 -
So about 34k each on average, from people worth 20m+.
Great. Really great.It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
And the fact is that the really wealthy people never appear as such because the majority of their assets and income are not reportable under tax rules, if they are clever.
For example, many rich people will deposit wealth with banks offshore and borrow from them in the UK to fund their living expenses, appearing only as debtors to HMRC.0 -
Was it not this month that Cameron gave tax breaks to all his millionaire chums ? Something like £43,000 for each million of Income every year?0
-
Last time i checked, you dont pay tax on your assets in this countryOld_Slaphead wrote: »Erm, 5800 x 20mill = £116 bill
Tax of £200mill is less than 0.2% of assets - ie negligible
Somebody got their decimal points in a twist ?????
As a unit of measure, tax take vs assets sounds meaningless0 -
Was it not this month that Cameron gave tax breaks to all his millionaire chums ? Something like £43,000 for each million of Income every year?
It is the beginning of a new tax year and the top tax bracket is moving from 50% to 45% rate, if that's what you mean.
A tax reduction is not a tax break.
And the 50% rate performed very poorly in raising the tax take, perhaps unfortunately.Last time i checked, you dont pay tax on your assets in this country
Indirectly you can do. Council tax, for instance, is largely asset-based.
In fact, it's a shame in some ways there is not more exploration of this area. It is not always helpful to tax productive (and income-producing) enterprise to death whilst leaving assets well alone.
Income tax acts as a heavy disincentive to wealth creation, employment and enterprise.
Really rich people have minimal income, using company and trust structures to pay for their lifestyles.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards