We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Laughable annuity quotes

Options
I have a few little pension pots from places that I worked with for 2 or 3 years.
Got a summary from one this week. It's laughable:

Pension pot: £15k
Estimated pension = £30 per month, before tax


That means it would take me over 40 years to "use up" the pension pot! And thats assuming there is no capital appreciation on the pension pot.

Annuities seem to be daylight robbery. What is the point of saving for your retirement if you are going to be ripped off on retirement day?
«13456789

Comments

  • Like with everything else it pays to shop around.

    I'd expect you to be able to do considerably better than that although it does depend on the conditions that has attached (uprating, guarantee period etc).
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mike004 wrote: »
    Got a summary from one this week. It's laughable:

    Pension pot: £15k
    Estimated pension = £30 per month, before tax

    That's an annuity rate of 2.4% which is pretty poor. What terms were you looking for - ie joint, index-linked etc?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,155 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    An annuity of that amount seems very low for someone retiring at a normal age - at what age would it be taken? In any case at those figures it would be inflation linked: at 3% inflation your income would have tripled by the end of 40 years.
  • mike004
    mike004 Posts: 128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Linton wrote: »
    An annuity of that amount seems very low for someone retiring at a normal age - at what age would it be taken? In any case at those figures it would be inflation linked: at 3% inflation your income would have tripled by the end of 40 years.

    65 age of retirement.
    I don't think it's index-linked. Anyway, it only amounts to a gallon of petrol a week. After paying in for 3 years...

    Pension funds are yet another rip off in Rip Off Britain.
  • Reue
    Reue Posts: 569 Forumite
    mike004 wrote: »
    65 age of retirement.
    I don't think it's index-linked. Anyway, it only amounts to a gallon of petrol a week. After paying in for 3 years...

    Pension funds are yet another rip off in Rip Off Britain.

    3 years is far too short a time to be paying into a pension. Its no surprise the returns are low.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mike004 wrote: »
    65 age of retirement.
    I don't think it's index-linked.

    It will be at that rate so perhaps you should check.
    Anyway, it only amounts to a gallon of petrol a week. After paying in for 3 years...

    Pension funds are yet another rip off in Rip Off Britain.

    What do you expect after paying in for 3 years? Pensions are designed to be built up over 40/45 years.

    Is this your total pension provision or do you have others?
  • mike004
    mike004 Posts: 128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Reue wrote: »
    3 years is far too short a time to be paying into a pension. Its no surprise the returns are low.
    Read the OP.
  • mike004
    mike004 Posts: 128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    jem16 wrote: »
    What do you expect after paying in for 3 years? Pensions are designed to be built up over 40/45 years.

    Is this your total pension provision or do you have others?

    It's one of several small pension pots, from places where I have worked for 2 or 3 years.

    Regardless of the size of the pot, annuity rates are shockingly low.
    Insurance firms are retaining sizeable capital sums and just paying out measly pensions based on gilt investments.
    Can they hand over all the pot, please? And I'll buy the treasury stock myself...
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mike004 wrote: »
    It's one of several small pension pots, from places where I have worked for 2 or 3 years.

    Why not amalgamate them into one larger pot then?
    Regardless of the size of the pot, annuity rates are shockingly low.
    Insurance firms are retaining sizeable capital sums and just paying out measly pensions based on gilt investments.

    Insurance firms are not making a packet on annuities. They are designed to give you peace of mind for however long you live. Some will gain and others will lose, just like any insurance.
    Can they hand over all the pot, please? And I'll buy the treasury stock myself...

    Nothing to stop you doing that. You don't have to buy an annuity. You can use Drawdown instead.
  • Proxy
    Proxy Posts: 245 Forumite
    edited 2 April 2013 at 1:30PM
    mike004 wrote: »
    Insurance firms are retaining sizeable capital sums

    ...as required by EU and UK legislation to ensure these payments are sustainable. You're aiming your anger at the wrong target.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.