We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Living on £53 a week.....

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/iain-duncan-smith-i-could-get-by-on-53-a-week-8556002.html
Iain Duncan Smith: I could get by on £53 a week


Online petition calls on the Work and Pensions Secretary - who currently takes home £1,581 a week after tax - to prove it


Could this take off?
Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
«13456

Comments

  • Fishingtime
    Fishingtime Posts: 757 Forumite
    500 Posts
    I think this has been done before a few years back. I forget who did it.
    Owing on CC £00.00 :j

    It's like shooting nerds in a barrel
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    It's never a fair experiment when they do this. Starting from a point of a bigger house to start with, phone probably on contract etc., it's not the same as sustained survival. Correspondingly, in the long term on £53/week you can make economies of buying a sack of potatoes/hot water bottles/etc as opposed to amortising those costs over a week.

    In short, anyone ever trying it will be a pure publicity thing
  • marathonic
    marathonic Posts: 1,789 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    paddyrg wrote: »
    In short, anyone ever trying it will be a pure publicity thing

    Exactly... it's not as if he's going to attempt it, find out he couldn't live on that amount and subsequently increase benefits for everyone in receipt of them....
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,436 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    paddyrg wrote: »
    It's never a fair experiment when they do this. Starting from a point of a bigger house to start with, phone probably on contract etc., it's not the same as sustained survival. Correspondingly, in the long term on £53/week you can make economies of buying a sack of potatoes/hot water bottles/etc as opposed to amortising those costs over a week.

    In short, anyone ever trying it will be a pure publicity thing

    I agree. Someone would need to survive on this for an extended period with no access to any savings or use of credit card to delay payment.
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I don't really see why politicians should have to prove that they can live off £53 a week given that no one on benefits has to live off £53 a week.

    Even income based JSA for under 25s is £56.25 a week (£71 a week for over 25s) plus when you add on housing benefit and council tax benefit then the actual amount received is significantly greater.

    Perhaps instead of signing a petition claiming that politicians should try living on less than benefits claimants actually receive, people on minimal benefits should get themselves a job, so they can live on more than whatever the real figure that they actually receive is.
  • The_White_Horse
    The_White_Horse Posts: 3,315 Forumite
    £53 a week AFTER bills and rent paid!!???!!! what a disgrace. these beggars should have NOTHING after bills and rent is paid. Most working people would do well to have that type of cash after they have paid all their bills.

    scroungers want want want. Get a job and pay your way.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    £53 a week AFTER bills and rent paid!!???!!! what a disgrace. these beggars should have NOTHING after bills and rent is paid. Most working people would do well to have that type of cash after they have paid all their bills.

    scroungers want want want. Get a job and pay your way.
    ]

    A little more than IDS allegedly paid for breakfast recently (on expenses). An equally fatuous pointless remark.

    I guess it depends what bills are paid and what still need to be found out of that £53. Something tells me it isn't his going "on the lash" money..
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • The_White_Horse
    The_White_Horse Posts: 3,315 Forumite
    the whole point is this: people that don't work are entitled to nothing. they should be grateful for every £ they receive and have it drummed into them that every £ is in effect stolen out of the pockets of those who do work and they should be ashamed to be a beggar living in this way.

    the benefit should be a "safety net" to help those who fall on bad times - and be paid at a much higher level to actually help those people.

    the workers, who work and pay tax are in it together to assist each other when times are tough. people don't work to support a money grubbing underclass that never has and never will contribute.
  • mildredalien
    mildredalien Posts: 1,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    £53 a week AFTER bills and rent paid!!???!!! what a disgrace. these beggars should have NOTHING after bills and rent is paid. Most working people would do well to have that type of cash after they have paid all their bills.

    scroungers want want want. Get a job and pay your way.

    I genuinely can't tell if you are being sarcastic....

    If you assume rent and utilities are paid (water, gas, council tax, electric.) then £53 a week isn't an awful lot for every other expense you may need. Food and household goods, bus/train fares or running a car (if you want people to get jobs they need to be able to get to interviews), you'll need access to the internet to be able to search for jobs and apply online, a phone to contact potential employers or the job centre (or perhaps even family or friends!!). Even if someone on benefits has no social life, no method of entertainment, never does anything that gives them the slightest enjoyment out of life that's still not a great deal to live on each month.
    Savings target: £25000/£25000
    :beer: :T


  • mildredalien
    mildredalien Posts: 1,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    Oh my bad, I was replying before I saw your later post, I guess you weren't being sarcastic. As you were!
    Savings target: £25000/£25000
    :beer: :T


This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.