Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

ian duncan smith giving up trying to cut benefits

A bit tongue in cheek this... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/9962079/Iain-Duncan-Smith-weve-given-up-trying-to-cut-benefits.html he basically arguing he has not cut welfare just the rate of increase of benefits . Is he giving up?

Comments

  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    edited 30 March 2013 at 3:42PM
    daz378 wrote: »
    A bit tongue in cheek this... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/9962079/Iain-Duncan-Smith-weve-given-up-trying-to-cut-benefits.html he basically arguing he has not cut welfare just the rate of increase of benefits . Is he giving up?

    Without a radiacl change in policy and philosophy I don't see how any government can really cut welfare. It is like squeezing a balloon, it just pops out somewhere else.

    The only ways to reduce it (take the air out) are to get more people into real work, that pays at least a living wage allowing them to contribute to the state or reduce the actual benefits in a draconian way so that people suffer.

    As the economy is unlikely to create the conditions for the former and heading up to an election I can't see the latter either.

    With inflation on key essentials for survival outstripping RPI?CPI, for the foreseeable future, political choices about how to make real cuts, to welfare will become more difficult for any party.

    They could of course admit we are more like Greece than Germany but I don't think they want to wear that egg on their face just yet.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • Dreadzone
    Dreadzone Posts: 24 Forumite
    With £1 in £3 spent on welfare it will be very difficult to contain spending without reducing welfare.

    It is looking like many tough choices will not be made before the next election. Indeed, public finances will be in a worse position.

    What are the chances of Labour actually being able to deal decisively with the remaining deficit?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 345.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 450.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 237.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 612.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.3K Life & Family
  • 250.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.