We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Please Help with Bankruptcy and join property
Comments
-
New accounts opened last month. I went BR in N Ireland on 21/3.0
-
My debt is due to gambling from 2000 - 2005. I have had over 100 credits accounts over a ten year period. I did state all this on SoA. I had 15 creditors but 5 are payday when i went BR.0
-
Well the rules in NI are different to here so can't really say but you may get a BRO, or their equivilant for the gambling and I expect the fact you took the Payday loans out will be looked at and considered with that.BSCno.87The only stupid question is an unasked oneLoving life as a Kernow Hippy0
-
If you and your spouse own property simultaneously, that property may be included in the bankruptcy land parcel and be potentially accessible to pay creditors.
To add, the OR is only concerned with the BR's 'share' [or, 'interest] in a property, in a bankruptcy.
In this instance, the property concerned is in negative equity...therefore the BR's interest in that property amounts to nil value.
Unless the OR reckons the property's value is going to dramatically increase in a few years time, then the beneficial interest is reverted back to the BR.
The OP's concern focusses on the fact, his property has a joint mortgage.
He and his spouse wish to get rid of it.
As he is looking at BR, any subsequent shortfall on the property [whether sold by agreement, or re-possessed]....is..or may, fall completely to his spouse.
[Shortfall is unsecured debt...the mortgage pre-dates his potential BR, so his portion would fall in that BR....thus his spouse will be pursued for the full amount.]
What the OP is trying to do is to minimise the effect a shortfall will have on his spouse, and her limited cash assets.
His spouse's cash assets would have nothing to do with his BR. [not his assets].
BR will have no worse impact on future life than scurrying round trying to re-pay debts in an impossible situation...and certainly that course of action won't benefit creditors.
BR does allow the individual to make a fresh start.
Or, is that fact viewed as an adverse impact?No, I don't think all other drivers are idiots......but some are determined to change my mind.......0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards