We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Liability order/Council Tax
Comments
-
debt_doctor wrote: »..............And how daft is your OR?! - more likely temp admin.
DD
My OR told me that parking charges (County Court ones) were exempt from BR.
And I mean that actual OR. The organ grinder himself, not a monkey.Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed0 -
Scary, very scary!My OR told me that parking fines (County Court ones) were exempt from BR.
And I mean that actual OR. The organ grinder himself, not a monkey.
Then again, I heard of a District Judge who said to a bankrupt - " your water arrears won't go in, they are utilities so exempt!"........strange.
DDDebt Doctor, Debt caseworker, Citizens' Advice Bureau .
Impartial debt advice services: Citizens Advice Bureau Find your local CAB *** National Debtline - Tel: 0808 808 4000*** BSC No. 100 ***0 -
The only effect of the liability order is that "technically" the council keeps the right to levy distraint over the arrears, even if made BR.
That's true , if they have a levy and have 'secured' the debt then they could enforce it but I don't know any council who do.I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.0 -
I agree with everything said above - I’d even suggest you are NOT allowed to pay, that would be a preference. Whilst they retain the “technical” right to attempt to levy, they have no right to force entry to do so. Keep them out and there is nothing else they can do to collect.
If you can handle the technical reading (heavy going) its all here
The choice bits are:
9.37
Where the official receiver is aware that there is a creditor who may seek to levy distress against property that is comprised in the bankruptcy estate he/she should take all necessary steps to protect and preserve the property in question.
A creditor with power to distrain may also levy, for an amount due prior to the bankruptcy order, against exempt property (but this is subject to any limits in the power to distrain (see paragraphs 9.6 to 9.14) and the distrainor’s code of practice) or property acquired by the bankrupt after the order (whether or not in the latter case the property has been claimed by the trustee). This action may result in a challenge under The Human Rights Act 1998.
0 -
OR office told me that at least it was for only 647.43 it could be thousands. Not sure he grasped the fact that I am so brassic I am bankrupt so wouldn't matter if it was 647 or 60 thousand if I don't have it I don't have it.
I hope to god they don't question utilities as I have £1900 to e-on oh dear me!
Thanks all again for this wonderful board!BSC no.370 AD March 14
:xmastree:SPC no. 196 target £350 for Christmas '14:xmastree:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards