We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Atos's underhand tactics..again!!
Comments
-
if they recorded every assessment, it would prevent them from recording their blatant lies on the assessments, meaning ATOS would likely miss their targets and not get their bonus's as per their contract.to be honest, i dont see why anyone should have to request a recorded interview.
they record all your phone calls automaticaaly, so why not the WCA?
surely it will protect them as much as the claimant? or it should ....
They get paid for those that they assess as being fit for work, no matter if those people appeal and win.[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
I tried to record the dd's WCA. I failed
Could just hear mumble mumble mumble. If I though it out better I should have worn a shirt with a breast pocket. Open handbag sat on the knee just didn't work :rotfl: 4 Stones and 0 pounds or 25.4kg lighter :j0 -
they wouldnt accept a 'secret' recording as evidence anyway.
you cannot record without their knowledge, so it would be inadmissable0 -
You are right, it would be inadmissible in court, but it is surprising what tribunals will allow. Often all you need to do is submit the written transcript to the tribunal as part of your evidence and confirm that the original recording is available.I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.0
-
Rubbish! First you can legally, covertly record a conversation, not that the WCA actually is a conversation. Secondly, a tribunal is at liberty to accept whatever evidence it chooses.they wouldnt accept a 'secret' recording as evidence anyway.
you cannot record without their knowledge, so it would be inadmissable0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards