We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advice on company van and accidents
Sundial12
Posts: 1 Newbie
Please could you give me any advice on where my husband stands with regard to his company van and signing a contract agreeing to a n excess of £750 which he has to pay if he has an accident or even if someone damages the vehicle in which he is at no fault of. He is being ordered to sign it or he will lose his job! Is this right? The company vehicles are only covered by third party only and I suppose they are looking at ways to save on repairs, but having to pay out of his own pocket if someone else was at fault just seems wrong!:mad:
0
Comments
-
I have read on here somewhere that putting an excess into his contract is illegal and unenforcable so he need not worry about that. I will try and find the linkBe Alert..........Britain needs lerts.0
-
No.He needs to take legal advice. Tell him to consult his trades union solicitor for free advice.Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
-
Ignore my earlier thread, it appears that they possibly can charge an excesss, there are as many posts for as there are against on here. As above find proper legal advice on this one.Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.0
-
paddedjohn wrote: »I have read on here somewhere that putting an excess into his contract is illegal and unenforcable so he need not worry about that. I will try and find the link
Interestingly it would not be an excess in the true sense of the word as the employer has Third Party Only Cover eg only has cover for damage to other people's property or injury.
They in effect self insure their own damage but with the employees contributing towards the first £750 of it.
As they have no own damage insurance, they would be able to claim the £750 on damage that they would not have neccessarily claimed for anyway as it would not be covered by a comprehensive policy and / or would be under the excess limit of an own damage policy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards