We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Planning Drawdown

2

Comments

  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I take my capped drawdown as one lump per pension year. My pension year is not aligned with the tax year so that if it suits me, I can draw nil in one tax year and double the normal in the next. I've used this manoeuvre once already and it saved me some tax, hurray!
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    P.S. It was someone on MSE who told me that the two "tranches" or "pots" are referred to as "arrangements".
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • peterg1965
    peterg1965 Posts: 2,166 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 31 January 2013 at 11:07PM
    A question for the IFAs, at the point of crystallisation, how do you and HMRC know what portion of LTA has been used? Is there a formal letter from the pension provider and/or HMRC to say what % has been used?

    Then after crystallisation you can continue to grow the remaining 75% pension pot (assuming 25% Tax free taken) to whatever size you can/want and this has no bearing on subsequent pension crystallisation's.
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kidmugsy wrote: »
    P.S. It was someone on MSE who told me that the two "tranches" or "pots" are referred to as "arrangements".

    The financial industry delights in having loads of terms for the same thing, and overloading terms such as "bond" with many different meanings.

    I've seen pension pots called "arrangements", "schemes", "policies", "plans", and many other things besides.

    My Group Personal Pension web site regularly uses three different terms and sometimes two different ones on the same page.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • Camdoon
    Camdoon Posts: 37 Forumite
    GhIFA wrote: »
    The third option that you mention (taken as one lump sum) is Flexible Drawdown. This is only available if you have other sources of secure pension income (annuity already in payment, final salary pension in payment, state pension just as examples) in excess of £20,000pa. If you meet these criteria you can withdraw funds from you flexible drawdown pot as you please - however, you are still only entitled to 25% of the fund tax free - the rest will be treated as taxable income, and taxed accordingly.

    I will fall into the category of having over £20k work and state pension. In addition I have £15k in a Standard Life stakeholder pension and £40k in Scottish Widows AVCs. I am considering merging these and using flexible drawdown as required. Anything I have read talks about taxing the drawdown but makes no mention of the 25% tax free. Also is 25% of any growth tax free or how does that work? Sorry if these have been answered before.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gadgetmind wrote: »
    All jolly complicated and a good argument against phased drawdown unless you've got good reasons to go this way.
    Consider the effect of starting say three chunks at 16 month intervals. You now have staggered GAD calculations for both the three yearly calculations before 75 and the annual ones after 75. That can help to smooth out variations in the capped income level due to capital value or rule changes.
  • GhIFA
    GhIFA Posts: 619 Forumite
    Gatser wrote: »
    What I do not understand, using an example:

    YEAR1
    Funds / Cash = £400k
    So we chose to crystallise £200k, taking 25% TFC
    This gives:
    Funds/Cash = £350k
    And records showing Crystallised £150k (in Drawdown)
    NonCrystallised £200k

    YEAR 4 (Review)
    Now Funds/Cash valued at £380k
    Can we now crystallise another £230k?

    Your plan will then consist of two parts - the crystallised fund (i.e. approx £150k after taking tax free lump sum), and the non-crystallised fund (still approx £200k).

    You can crystallise further funds whenever you want from the remaining crystallised fund. In your example, whilst the overall value of the plan has increased by £30k, if this has been split evenly between the crystallised and uncrystallised funds, then you will have a further £215k available to you to crystallise.

    Hope that helps.
    I am an IFA. Any comments made on this forum are provided for information only and should not be construed as advice. Should you need advice on a specific area then please consult a local IFA.
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jamesd wrote: »
    You now have staggered GAD calculations for both the three yearly calculations

    How do drawdown providers track this? Do they keep everything in separate pots (as most (all?) do for crystallised versus uncrystallised) or is it all hypothecated?

    I guess you also get hit with 3x the GAD calculation fees?

    What happens if you switch drawdown provider?

    Sorry for all the questions!
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • Gatser
    Gatser Posts: 625 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    GhIFA wrote: »
    Your plan will then consist of two parts - the crystallised fund (i.e. approx £150k after taking tax free lump sum), and the non-crystallised fund (still approx £200k).
    You can crystallise further funds whenever you want from the remaining crystallised fund. In your example, whilst the overall value of the plan has increased by £30k, if this has been split evenly between the crystallised and uncrystallised funds, then you will have a further £215k available to you to crystallise.
    Hope that helps.

    Errrr.... I think so thanks.... but just to check...

    I am thinking there must be an "approved" method for apportioning the total investments value between Crystallised(C) & Non Crystallised(NC) "pots"?
    Your answer suggests that this is done by allocating in proportion to N:NC.

    However... I would argue that following the withdrawal of the £50k TFC we are left with Investments of £350k, split as:
    C = £150k and NC £200k (ie 43%:57%)
    Therefore any change in Investments value should be allocated 57% to the NC pot.

    Am I correct?

    I am not an IFA.... just a stubborn accountant! Cheers!!:beer:
    THE NUMBER is how much you need to live comfortably: very IMPORTANT as part 1 of Retirement Planning. (Average response to my thread is £26k pa)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.