Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Balls Vs Osborne

Read this semi-humorous bit in the Telegraph today:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9833585/Snapshot-Do-the-Osborne-diet...-and-lose-pounds-fast.html
If you’re Mr Balls, you believe that financial troubles under the last Labour government were due to global economic problems, whereas financial troubles under the current Coalition are due to the Coalition’s own incompetence.

If you’re Mr Osborne, meanwhile, you believe that financial troubles under the last Labour government were due to the Labour government’s own incompetence, whereas financial troubles under the current Coalition are due to global economic problems.

Important to get that straight.

Comments

  • Wookster wrote: »

    Adversarial politics between two lightweight non-entities. Sums up our plight as a nation I'm afraid.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
  • DaddyBear
    DaddyBear Posts: 1,208 Forumite
    They're both incompetent idiots and thoroughly dislikable. However, I agree more with Osborne's side of this particular argument.
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    DaddyBear wrote: »
    They're both incompetent idiots and thoroughly dislikable. However, I agree more with Osborne's side of this particular argument.

    Osborne is in office, and not being part of a Labour government sees the need to retain some contact with reality. Balls is in opposition and is a tribal political bully who sees it as fair game to say anything in order to try to win the votes of the gullible.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 345.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 450.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 237.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 612.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.3K Life & Family
  • 250.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.