We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Do You Think Income Tax Banding is Fair?

guruchelles
guruchelles Posts: 159 Forumite
edited 27 January 2013 at 1:20PM in Debate House Prices & the Economy
In tax year 2013-14 personal allowance (for most people) will be £9440.

The 20% tax rate will apply to earnings up to £32010.

The higher rate of 40% will apply to earnings from £32011, plus the PA, which is £41450.

And if you're lucky enough to earn over £150000 you'll pay 45% tax on those earnings.

Is this, in your opinion, fair? Should the jump be from 20% to 40%? Should the 40% threshold have come down? Should the personal allowance have gone up?

Interested to hear opinions. :)
«13456716

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Higher rate tax is paid on earnings above £41k not £32k.

    Given this is far above average earnings. Seems a reasonable level to be set at.

    I agree with the LibDem proposal to increase personal allowance to a far higher level. As is a policy of fairness.

    So I guess it's the 40% band that compensates.

    If you are lucky enough to earn above the 40% level. Then you always save tax by increasing pension contributions for example.
  • flashnazia
    flashnazia Posts: 2,168 Forumite
    I think anyone on NMW should not have to pay income tax. That's a threshold of around 11500 or thereabouts.
    "fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell)
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Higher rate tax is paid on earnings above £41k not £32k.

    Given this is far above average earnings. Seems a reasonable level to be set at.

    I agree with the LibDem proposal to increase personal allowance to a far higher level. As is a policy of fairness.

    So I guess it's the 40% band that compensates.

    If you are lucky enough to earn above the 40% level. Then you always save tax by increasing pension contributions for example.

    Have changed OP to make this more clear. :)

    Adding to your pension is all very well, but you won't see the benefit now (and may not actually ever see it!)
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Adding to your pension is all very well, but you won't see the benefit now (and may not actually ever see it!)

    Life is about maximising opportunity when it arises.

    Many people lose their well paid jobs in later employment life.
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Life is about maximising opportunity when it arises.

    Many people lose their well paid jobs in later employment life.

    Yes, I understand that, and that adding to your pension could be a great move if you can afford to, but there is an element of gamble that you're actually going to reach pensionable age.

    Also, I genuinely don't think that £41k is a huge amount, especially if you're the only wage-earner with children in a part of the country that's not cheap to live in. I'm not saying you'd be poor (I've been properly poor before and I'm under no illusions about this) but your take home pay would be about £2400pcm. You might need to spend nearly half of that on housing costs, then take off about £500 for bills and another £500 for groceries, clothing, fuel etc. That's not to mention savings, birthdays, Christmas. You're hardly living a luxury lifestyle and jetting off on holiday every five minutes.
  • dryhat
    dryhat Posts: 1,305 Forumite
    Any personal income tax from wages is not fair.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yes, I understand that, and that adding to your pension could be a great move if you can afford to, but there is an element of gamble that you're actually going to reach pensionable age.

    Also, I genuinely don't think that £41k is a huge amount, especially if you're the only wage-earner with children in a part of the country that's not cheap to live in. I'm not saying you'd be poor (I've been properly poor before and I'm under no illusions about this) but your take home pay would be about £2400pcm. You might need to spend nearly half of that on housing costs, then take off about £500 for bills and another £500 for groceries, clothing, fuel etc. That's not to mention savings, birthdays, Christmas. You're hardly living a luxury lifestyle and jetting off on holiday every five minutes.


    Take home this tax year is £2543 a month.

    All the things you mention are down to personal choice. Possible to live comfortably without spending huge sums.

    As for a pension. Statistically you are likely to live to a ripe old age.
    So I wouldn't wish to retire on just the state pension.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Doesn't NI fall from 12% to 2% on earnings above £42K.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes, I understand that, and that adding to your pension could be a great move if you can afford to, but there is an element of gamble that you're actually going to reach pensionable age.

    Also, I genuinely don't think that £41k is a huge amount, especially if you're the only wage-earner with children in a part of the country that's not cheap to live in. I'm not saying you'd be poor (I've been properly poor before and I'm under no illusions about this) but your take home pay would be about £2400pcm. You might need to spend nearly half of that on housing costs, then take off about £500 for bills and another £500 for groceries, clothing, fuel etc. That's not to mention savings, birthdays, Christmas. You're hardly living a luxury lifestyle and jetting off on holiday every five minutes.


    But over 80% of workers earn less than that.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ukcarper wrote: »
    But over 80% of workers earn less than that.

    Vast majority earn far nearer to £20k.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.