We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
100% mortgages?
Comments
-
Or, overpay a 160,000 mortgage by £200 per month for 3 years , at a rate of 5.48 and the balance would be 142,402. Without overpayment it would be
150,2440 -
So would the parent only be a guarentee until 25% of the LTV is paid? I definatly agree that just saving for a deposit is better in long run....0
-
No idea about your question.
But there is a balance in my opinion between saving longer to get a larger deposit, or getting a house quicker, not paying rent and overpaying the mortgage.0 -
No idea about your question.
But there is a balance in my opinion between saving longer to get a larger deposit, or getting a house quicker, not paying rent and overpaying the mortgage.
Yes good point, although fortunatly i'm in a good position to save as I live with my mum and only pay a small amount of board each month
0 -
I did have a 100% mortgage back in 2007. Selling my house now I am just going to break even to pay the outstanding mortgage.
However in that time I got married and we jointly we able to save a 15% deposit to buy a flat in London.
If I was offered a 100% mortgage again, would I take it - no. Is it the root of all evil - no. But since they are not available and probably never will be it doesnt really matter.0 -
There are 2-3 100% deals im aware of.
The lenders have different ways of working it. As kingstreet says, i think its only the 25% they would be liable for should you stop paying.
You would only be in negative equity if house prices dropper. If you stayed te same you would slowly gain the equity as you pay it off. If houses prices went up then you would gain equity quicker.
It all depends where you buy, some places houses are increases in value other the opposite can be said.
I dont see a problem with 100% mortgages in general - but i dont think theyre for the masses.
I bought my house, i have no intention of moving in the next 3-5 years so as far as im concerned i couldnt care less if my house was valued at £5 or £500,000 - so long as when i do come to move its valued at more than is outstanding (preferably with some profit in it).I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Thanks for your response ACG, this thread has been very helpful getting peoples opinions. There are so many different mortgages/deals etc I just wanted to find out a bit more about ones I wasnt too sure on!0
-
rebeccasykes1989 wrote: »Thanks for your response ACG, this thread has been very helpful getting peoples opinions. There are so many different mortgages/deals etc I just wanted to find out a bit more about ones I wasnt too sure on!
Just for some perspective - the classic US mortgage deal before WWII was that the purchaser put up 50% of the purchase price and took a mortgage that had a much shorter life than we expect nowadays.Free the dunston one next time too.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards