Case Study - Your Thoughts

ValHaller

SarEl wrote: »

..... And then there is history... which many posters here have about the OP and you don't.

Like most history, it seems that a single book - regardless of the number of volumes - will never cover it as well as 2 slim paperbacks by different authors.

sho_me_da_money wrote: »

Behave nagbag. Everytime I utter something in this section, the regular whingers start having a

dacouch

colino wrote: »

After reading that case study, I know, as it is so poor, that the OP is a current University lecturer in HR/Management.

I think he works in IT or sales

denla

dacouch wrote: »

I think he works in IT or sales

I think he's a pimp who spent his savings on a law degree, and now he's struggling to cope with homework so decided to ask for help on moneysavingexpert... but too proud to admit he wants help with homework so he fabricated this hobby story.

Uncertain

wouldbeqaulitymoneysaver wrote: »

That was my thought so try to help the poor sod.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions......

shocky_2

Op, you are focussing too much on the procedure rather than the substance of the matter. It depends what the offence was: if it was serious enough then it will warrant instant dismissal.

denla

Uncertain wrote: »

The road to hell is paved with good intentions......

Last night I was watching a TV drama about a cop who was wrongly convicted. After he was released, he killed the criminal because he believed there's no way for him to be exonerated. Well, he got exonerated alright, but ended up breaking the law time and time again. Planting evidence to successfully convict a rapist who kept walking free, and later personally killing murderers. Ending is a life imprisonment and him reading the bible saying that you just said. Lol.

Think this thread's dead now. We're all hijacking it.

ValHaller

denla wrote: »

.... Think this thread's dead now. We're all hijacking it.

The thread is not over until the fat lady posts.

heretolearn_2

that's me then :j

sho_me_da_money

youngsolicitor wrote: »

Op, you are focussing too much on the procedure rather than the substance of the matter. It depends what the offence was: if it was serious enough then it will warrant instant dismissal.

The offence did not constitute gross misconduct nor an instant dismissal. It just so happened that 2 other people who committed the same crime on the same day had some wages docked WITHOUT going through any formal procedure. The difference between the offenders? Two were white and one was black. Guess who the black one was? You got it.

Sambucus_Nigra

sho_me_da_money wrote: »

The offence did not constitute gross misconduct nor an instant dismissal. It just so happened that 2 other people who committed the same crime on the same day had some wages docked WITHOUT going through any formal procedure. The difference between the offenders? Two were white and one was black. Guess who the black one was? You got it.

Doesn't that always seem to happen to the people you know?