Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Voluntary taxation

2

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 10 December 2012 at 2:08PM
    movilogo wrote: »
    Why not simply close the legal loophole which allows company to dodge tax?

    Because it's not really a loophole. We live in the EU. EU holds free trade. Companies are free to harbour in any country they see fit.

    Microsoft are being set upon now, as their offices are in Ireland, and haven't paid any UK tax.

    Next it will be HP set upon....

    Theres nothing illegal going on. Politicians seem to talk as if we can just demand our taxes. People are then going round saying "just make them pay UK taxes". It's not as easy as this, and I have no idea what Policitians are making out that the current government can just put a stop to it. We'd have to get EU laws changed, or pull out.

    I've seen people and commentators suggest they should pay extra to have their business in the UK. But guess what, as soon as one of those companies (Starbucks) DOES voluntarily pay extra taxes, the same people set upon them branding the companie as playing games, choosing how much they owe etc. I mean, what do people actually want? As soon as they get what they did want, it seems it's wrong again. Some it seems won't be happy until the company leaves the UK, damaging us further and leaving all those with Franchies bankrupt.

    Only then, will some, it seems, see themselevs as sucessful....but the government will be blamed!
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    who 'willingly' pays more tax than they owe? If you are a business then the shareholders would rightly get very upset!

    This is almost admitting the Government can make better use of your money than you can - something that they prove is incorrect quite frequently!
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Maybe they could impute a profit margin onto large multi-nationals the same way that they do on small partnerships and businesses.
    I run a small business and have never had a profit margin dictated to me. We pay CT based purely on profit.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Because it's not really a loophole. We live in the EU. EU holds free trade. Companies are free to harbour in any country they see fit.

    Surely we can close the loophole...? Leave the EU...

    (a little pedantic yes, but my point is still valid I feel)
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Lokolo wrote: »
    Surely we can close the loophole...? Leave the EU...

    (a little pedantic yes, but my point is still valid I feel)

    Think we would have to just stop trading with most of the world. These companies are trading entirely within the rules.
  • dtsazza
    dtsazza Posts: 6,295 Forumite
    wymondham wrote: »
    who 'willingly' pays more tax than they owe? If you are a business then the shareholders would rightly get very upset!

    This is almost admitting the Government can make better use of your money than you can - something that they prove is incorrect quite frequently!
    In Starbucks' case it is somewhat rational.

    Not because they think the government will make better use of the money - but because Starbucks' customers are irrational, and Starbucks are affected by their decision making. Starbucks have judged their their "donation" of £20m will pacify public opinion to the extent that they will make more than £20m extra profit due to increased sales.

    I don't know whether their sums are correct - it must be quite difficult to predict what sort of sales gap they'd see from a tax-related PR backlash - but the principle is definitely sound.
  • mroing
    mroing Posts: 10 Forumite
    I support the principle. More than that, I do not support involuntary taxation. Involuntary taxation is a wolf in sheep's clothing - it's theft.

    There should be a protocol for anyone, corporation or individual, to donate money to the government. If people want to chip in for public services, it should be permitted.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    mroing wrote: »
    I support the principle. More than that, I do not support involuntary taxation. Involuntary taxation is a wolf in sheep's clothing - it's theft.

    There should be a protocol for anyone, corporation or individual, to donate money to the government. If people want to chip in for public services, it should be permitted.

    No problem, if you want to donate go ahead. Fill in a self assessment form and just inflate your income HMRC will do the rest.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • mroing
    mroing Posts: 10 Forumite
    I'm aware that it's possible, but I shouldn't have to lie about my income to be able to do it. Not that I would, of course, but if people want to do so then they should have a way of making it clear that that is their intention, rather than lying about things which detail the state of the national economy.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,159 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    mroing wrote: »
    if people want to do so then they should have a way of making it clear that that is their intention,


    Dear Mr Taxman,
    I have calculated my voluntary tax assessment as £1m, per the attached schedule. Please will confirm that this is acceptable in full settlement of my moral obligations.
    If I do not hear from you within one calendar month I shall assume that the matter is closed.
    Acceptance is deemed to be your confirmation that the money will be applied efficiently to correcting imbalances in the UK economy.
    Failure to return the attached acceptance slip will result in interest charges which will offset the total sum assessed.
    No further reminder will be issued.

    Yours faithfully,
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 346.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 238.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 613.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.5K Life & Family
  • 251.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.