We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Payday loan means being turned down for a mortgage in the future

James_N
James_N Posts: 1,090 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
edited 21 November 2012 at 10:05PM in Mortgages & endowments
Reportedly, having ever taken a payday loan will now bar you from a mortgage with many UK lenders in the future.

That bastion of truth, the Daily Mail, has the details.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/cardsloans/article-2231040/Payday-borrowers-face-Christmas-credit-shock.html

From December 2012 onwards, Experian will identify payday loans separately - and the banks react that the new information may trigger "fatal criteria" leading to automatic rejection, much as already happens with a serious financial mismanagement history.
Under no circumstances may any part of my postings be used, quoted, repeated, transferred or published by any third party in ANY medium outside of this website without express written permission. Thank you.
«134

Comments

  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,351 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As long ago as the middle of last year, my network's compliance department was warning that some lenders were starting to view payday loans as a precursor to potential financial problems and underwriting accordingly.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • betmunch
    betmunch Posts: 3,126 Forumite
    We have a number of cases that have been turned down due to using payday loans.

    Its not new news to anyone in the industry.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Buzby
    Buzby Posts: 8,275 Forumite
    It isn't the 'industry' the news is directed at - but the consumer! The fact PdL's are detrimental need to be highlighted.
  • About time.

    Banks, like many other institutions, have to make sure their interests are safe. It is absolutely right that if you are forced to take a PDL, then you have no right to a mortgage.

    Bail-outs cannot continue, and this is a further step in the right direction.
  • It is absolutely right that if you are forced to take a PDL, then you have no right to a mortgage.

    The words sledgehammer and nut spring to mind.
    You would suspect that reasonable approach would be not to look at a historic event and reject purely on the basis of that.
    But, they can do as they wish.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,351 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Although I can understand the possible implications, that a borrower had a short-term cashflow issue, surely those using an overdraft for a short period are guilty of exactly the same offence?

    Not everyone will constantly roll-over payday loans, just as not everyone will always be overdrawn. Surely, the frequency of such usage should be more important than the source of the finance?

    Perhaps your average overdraft user is a better "class" of customer and more deserving of a mortgage?
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Perhaps your average overdraft user is a better "class" of customer and more deserving of a mortgage?

    I don't think that is the issue, most people with cash flow problems are well aware of their overdraft facility and PDL's and an extension of what they can borrow on top of the overdraft. It would be madness to engage a PDL at the advertised interest rates when a better authorised overdraft rate is available.

    In my opinion, if someone has to resort to a PDL, where better sources of short term finance arn't available, one has to question their longer term solvency, if they are accepting the 1000's of % APR of a loan shark.

    I can understand the "hammer and nut" opinion, but even one borrowing episode must be scrutinised carefully.
  • i have some sympathy with ppl who are rejected by automated systems, when a human being looking at their record might agree that taking a PDL once some years ago was a 1-off. however, the automated systems are not new. and the general idea that PDLs are a very bad sign is (IMO) perfectly correct.

    "ever" is, i take it, an exaggeration, because won't PDLs drop off your record after 6 years?
  • betmunch
    betmunch Posts: 3,126 Forumite
    Buzby wrote: »
    It isn't the 'industry' the news is directed at - but the consumer! The fact PdL's are detrimental need to be highlighted.

    Yes I realise that thanks.

    My point was that if clients use a professional they would have known and circumvented the issue.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • bugged
    bugged Posts: 29 Forumite
    About time.

    Banks, like many other institutions, have to make sure their interests are safe. It is absolutely right that if you are forced to take a PDL, then you have no right to a mortgage.

    Bail-outs cannot continue, and this is a further step in the right direction.

    Common sense isn't welcome on here. They will run you off. :rotfl:

    I completely agree with your post. Well said. :T
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.