We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Evening Standard.. house prices could fall 50%
Comments
-
Blatantly misleading thread title.
It's not the Evening Standard saying house prices will fall 50%, it's some bozo we've never heard of.
Just HSW's daily routine of grasping at straws.
He's not even saying they could fall by 50%.
the article statesHouse prices are not stable. They have a cycle like everything else. America has understood this much earlier than the UK. There, house prices have already fallen by 50 per cent and they are affordable
He's talking about America dropped 50%.
there is no direct link between the America housing market and the UK housing market.
Shoddy OP title in my opinion and surprised nobody corrected the fault.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Tommygun2000 wrote: »How can you say I agree but not true in the same post?
I do not agree. I think there is a difference between price and value. The price is what the seller decides to put on it. The value can be worked out any number of ways but has very little to do with the price.
Sorry, I can't agree.
The price is what the seller and buyer mutually agree at the point of sale.
At that point of time it is the valuation of the property between the two parties.
I know a property that was bought in September 2003 for £145,500.
A guy knocked on their door in July the following year (10 months later) and offered £235,000. (61% HPI in 10 months)
To you and me and probably the wider market for that property, the buyer paid too much, but that is what he valued it as.
Incidently, it was 26 Cairntack Road, Belhelvie AB23 8RD for anyone doubting the detail.
Also incidently it was then sold in 2010 for £305,000:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Tommygun2000 wrote: »Well you must have been sleeping. In 2007 average UK house price was over 200K, now its fallen to in the 150's and still falling. This is the nominal 'price' if you take into account real inflation i.e the value it has fallen its around 30% and will be around 50% real term crash in a couple of years if things continue the way they are heading.
I wish people would get their facts correct.
According to the Land Registry.
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/public/house-prices-and-sales/search-the-index- Prices peaked at £182,301 in November 2007 (as opposed to your over £200k)
- They are currently £162,561 (a drop of 10.8% from peak). Ok, this is nominal and not REAL, but then people buy nominally
- The latest release shows that the YOY figure is positive
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Tommygun2000 wrote: »No what I said was average property has fallen around 30% in real terms, and IF THINGS CONTINUE the way they are going then property will continue falling. This is a fact not opinion.
As shown above, currently properties are 10.8% below peak.
the bottom was April 2009 where the nominal price was £151,377 on average.
Since the bottom, prices are up 7.4%
YOY there is a small increase, albeit in reality we are seeing nominal stagnation.
In fact, we have seen a nominal increase and probably REAL terms stagnation in the last 3 years:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
The author married Rupert Murdoch's daughter. I wouldn't trust his judgement.0
-
Tommygun, howabout giving your thanks to ISTL for his/her excellent post correcting your figures?0
-
could someone put the land registry twitter thing up. I read on another site yesterday that it was a minus. If it had been a positive I am sure Hamish would have started a thread about it.0
-
moneyinmypocket wrote: »House prices won't drop - just because person A doesn't want to pay doesn't mean person B won't!
Those who are priced out should cancel sky and beer money
They already have dropped0 -
Tommygun2000 wrote: »I say gold is a worthless lump of metal. I mean what good is it?
For a start, I see a fair bit of it used to plate the edge connectors of computer memory, CPU pins and sockets.
Switch and relay contacts are often gold plated too.
I believe gold is used to make tiny connections within transistors and integrated circuits.
You say that it is worthless, and no good. The electronics industry seems to have other ideas.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards