We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

Imterest on cash within a mainly shares SIPP

24

Comments

  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DRSMITH wrote: »
    Bonds imply longer period (if holding until maturity), so wouldn't work for my shorter term need. Do you concur?

    Do you really intend to have a portfolio of just equities and some ephemeral cash without any allocation to fixed interest?
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • coastline
    coastline Posts: 1,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 31 October 2012 at 7:42PM
    I have a S&S ISA ...again very little interest to hold cash...
    Might not be what you want but if you think the market is overbought then maybe going short could be the answer with a part of your deposit..
    The chart is an ETF...I would guess theres plenty to choose from.

    graph.cgi?code=letf:cotn:XUKS.L&yearsback=1&time_step=1&linetype=line&width=500&height=400&code=li:cotn:UKX.L&rebase=on&linetype=line&buylines=on&triggers=on&
  • DRSMITH
    DRSMITH Posts: 14 Forumite
    gadgetmind wrote: »
    Do you really intend to have a portfolio of just equities and some ephemeral cash without any allocation to fixed interest?
    I'm at stage of picking SIPP provider.
    So yes, I will have wide choice of assets to select at that time.
    I first need to choose a suitable SIPP provider.
    SIPPdeal look OK, but only offer near zero interest.
  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    DRSMITH wrote: »
    I believe it's because it's whats known as 'final salary scheme' that it means applicant are forced to take pro' advice.
    I'm ex-Nat west employee with Royal Bank of Scotland pension scheme.
    I understand this a HL requirement not a Gov't or legal requirement.
    I'd be surprised if any SIPP provider (or PP provider) would undertake a transfer from a final salary scheme without you taking advice due to the potential for miss-selling claims later (so yes it is a bit of back-covering, but not unreasonable).
  • DRSMITH
    DRSMITH Posts: 14 Forumite
    coastline wrote: »
    I have a S&S ISA ...again very little interest to hold cash...
    Might not be what you want but if you think the market is overbought then maybe going short could be the answer with a part of your deposit..
    The chart is an ETF...I would guess theres plenty to choose from.
    Thank-you Coastline, but that doesn't sound like the right tool for me.
  • DRSMITH
    DRSMITH Posts: 14 Forumite
    ManAtHome wrote: »
    I'd be surprised if any SIPP provider (or PP provider) would undertake a transfer from a final salary scheme without you taking advice due to the potential for miss-selling claims later (so yes it is a bit of back-covering, but not unreasonable).
    I beg to differ. If advice is for their needs, they can pay.
    They are free to insist on it and I am free to decline to spend £500+vat for a service for which I get no return. If I did pay to cover HL's back, then that proves I'm not fit to make financial decisions....IMO. :-)
  • fiesta04
    fiesta04 Posts: 516 Forumite
    edited 31 October 2012 at 9:37PM
    You will need to pay an IFA to sign off a Final Salary Pension for a transfer to SIPP. It is normally considered unwise to move from a FSP.

    Saying that I did the same earlier this year and bought an annuity with it and I am only 55. Many people will say I was unwise to do it, but I considered it to be the correct move for me.

    F4
  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    DRSMITH wrote: »
    I beg to differ. If advice is for their needs, they can pay.
    Not quite - if you don't pay up to to get a 'not HLs fault' sign-off they decline your business.

    Anyway, best of luck with your search, but I'd still be surprised if you get a 'no fuss' transfer.
  • DRSMITH
    DRSMITH Posts: 14 Forumite
    ManAtHome wrote: »
    Not quite - if you don't pay up to to get a 'not HLs fault' sign-off they decline your business.

    Anyway, best of luck with your search, but I'd still be surprised if you get a 'no fuss' transfer.
    SIPPdeal have confirmed they are happy for me to exercise my free-will..for free.

    I appreciate your input never the less. Mustn't shoot the messenger who is trying to help.
  • DRSMITH
    DRSMITH Posts: 14 Forumite
    fiesta04 wrote: »
    You will need to pay an IFA to sign off a Final Salary Pension for a transfer to SIPP. It is normally considered unwise to move from a FSP.

    Saying that I did the same earlier this year and bought an annuity with it and I am only 55. Many people will say I was unwise to do it, but I considered it to be the correct move for me.

    F4
    Thank-you Fiesta. See my previous reply, which crossed re IFA.
    For my reason to tf to SIPP:
    In short, the small print means my current pension fund won't keep pace with inflation and there are no options to how fund is administered.
    By transferring to a SIPP I retain control, can buy equities or annuity or etc etc..
    Everyone circumstances and pension rules differ, and there is a mass of small detail which needs to be gone through to make an informed choice, so IFA's do have their role for those that need it.
    For sake of others reading this, the move to SIPP isn't something I'm doing lightly, but after much checking of facts of 'what is' and soul searching on risk and 'what could be' including worst case scenario.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.